Oh, have you ever heard of analysis paralysis ..which is what you are supporting, IMO.
No what I’m advocating is proper planning to achieve desired results unlike you who seems to be advocating to act on knee jerk and analyze the impact later no matter how irresponsible.
In the beginning, which is where we are I would rather go after the low hanging fruit. As technology improves and costs decrease the implementation that you want NOW regardless of environmental and human impact can be implemented.
But why act on facts when we can **** away trillions for little or no benefit. Be my guest to spend as much as you want personally chasing your dream but when it comes time to population benefits I prefer appropriate and legitimate expenditures since my taxes are paying for it.