"Improving Assessment of Low Frequency Room Acoustics - PART I"
The first part of this very interesting research involved generating a number of verbal descriptors for subjective quality of bass. They use a corps of trained listeners, and a fairly well known method called "descriptive...
If you built your own space, I assume you only have a single layer of sheetrock on the inside (?). Metal studs? I would think that if you design you own room , and it has a reasonable amount of absorption in it (furniture etc.) then you wouldn't need much additional LF absorption. How thick...
Yes, when you are talking about a high end audio system, the cost of room treatment starts to look not as expensive by comparison. Doens't mean it's cheap though. On the other hand, moving subs around and/or optimizing level/delay etc. really can be cheap. Room treatment still might be...
This is going to be a multipart review of a very interesting Audio Engineering Society (AES) paper that attempts to correlate some basic room acoustic parameters to subjective impressions for low frequencies in small rooms. For those inclined to read the full paper, it is:
"Improving the...
Has anyone had any experience, or have any opinions about in-ceiling subs? For example the Sonance Architectual Series BPS-1 subwoofer system.
http://www.sonance.com/products/speakers/detail/474
I like the idea of putting at least some subwoofers in locations other than along the walls...
That's a very good question. I do seem to remember seeing a pattern show up in one room repeatedly, but I'm not sure I remember it. In any caseit was probably particular to that room and those seating locations. It might be worth looking into that though, I think I will put it on my to-do list.
I would say that I'm in the 'sounds the same if eq'ed the same' camp. As far as I know, the effects (talking small signal domain) are all minimum phase. Possible exception to that might be in the combined response in the crossover region, where theoritically you can get a non-min-phase...
True, it can be used as a subjective term. And, yes, I suspect room resonances are often what is heard. Whether it's an objective property of the subwoofer or a subjective quality, what I object to is the idea that it is some property of the sub that is separate from its magnitude/phase...
Well, SFM sort of does that. Sort of, because you measure the alternative locations first, then select the best. The Synthesis system will allow you to see the prospective curves of different alternatives. The other general approach would be to have some sort of criterion, measure a basic set...
If you only have one seat, the comparison is moot. SFM is really oriented towards multiple seats, and getting the seats consistant with each other. It would be possible, by changing a line or two of code to have SFM look for flat response at one seat, but that isn't really the intent.
Interesting question. In rectangular rooms, you culd set up the DBA and then use it as a startiing solutin for SFM. It might be the case that SFM would find a better solution, particularly if the room was acoustically non rectangular. In a non-rectangular room, DBA doesn't really apply.