i had hear this new edition and the mfsl is much better than this new edition and the new mix is not good in my opiniom
the 24/96 seems not be better than the mfsl:
http://dr.loudness-war.info/album/list/year?artist=bob+marley&album=exodus
Good day;
Louis Armstrong born August 4, 1901 died July 6, 1971), nicknamed Satchmo, Satch, or Pops was in my opinion the best of the best jazz trumpeter that we have records of today! :rolleyes:
I did a search in amazon about if i could find (found nothing)a cd box set of his complete...
so he did remastered the legend that we can buy in for example hdtracks?
ps. would it be a good idea to cut the 24-96 to 24-44 or 24-48 khz with dbpoweramp or would that be a kind of "raw cut" affecting the audio quality? any thoughts?
do anyone know if the 24bit 96 version is remastered?
ps. i wish it was in 24 bit 48 khz instead, but still i hope this digital version is very good.
ps.2 all the albums of Bob Marley were original mastered in stereo? no mono?
i understand
what do you then consider the best bit and rate? what it comes to mind is that 24 bit 48 khz is the normal in movies so at least for that should the music been made if it is for movie but about music mmm i had read that some instrument goes beyond 20 khz even when we can not hear...
Hello;
what do you consider to be the best way to listen to digital music?
I have hear 48 khz is better than 44 khz and that 16 bit is not the complete range of the dinamic stuff but that 24 bit is to much that maybe 20 bit should be the best, why not a new digital numer 20 bit 40 khz...