Hello DaveyF,
I’ve discussed my perspective on this extensively before, so will not repeat those ideas here.
Instead, let me offer an analogy:
In America, the diet industry makes $66 billion annually.
A person who exercises semi-regularly primarily in medium intense bursts using...
Hello Spirit,
I happen to have a soft spot for idiosyncratic speakers - ESL 57s, LS3/5as, WE15as, etc - but I could never live with their inherent limitations were they my sole choice. No amount of blood, sweat or tears will make them anything other than very captivating and very characterful...
Ideologically speaking, I have no problem with tone controls nor EQ (digital or analogue). To me, if a person finds their enjoyment is enhanced through utilisation of a tone control or EQ, more power to them.
And while it’s true we are limited to whatever subjective preferential decisions...
Nearly sixteen years ago my wife and I marched, or should I say, swaggered down the aisle to "Old Landmark" having moments earlier officially become husband and wife. For many reasons it was one of the best moments of my life, and it felt like Aretha and the Southern California Community Choir...
Hello ack, tima and micro,
A higher refresh rate/film rate does not, in-and-of-itself, lead to higher resolution. A higher refresh rate/film rate can lead only to higher perceived resolution (1).
Why do I say perceived resolution? Because we are perceivers. And we have been perceiving since...
Dear Peter,
Out of respect for you and your thread let me apologise for my lack of discipline in sticking to the topic of your original post.
It appears Spirit, the General and I have areas of common overlap. I will now depart this thread to allow it to return to its intended course.
But...
It took me while to work out Peart's not playing the ride cymbal on snare hits, and playing closer to the bell on the "1" and the "2 &" with the kick for subtle emphasis. I also initially thought he was playing quarter notes on the off beat during the section in which he and Geddy trade fours...
Hey Spirit,
Right. But there’s often two processes at work there. One may be increased resolution in the mechanism, the other may be increased perception/understanding on the part of the individual.
My own comprehension of the difference between a guitarist playing an upstroke versus a...
Bah-DUM-Pssssssshhhhhhhh.
853guy
P.S. Could you tell I was using a maple stick with a nylon tip, and hitting the bow of the cymbal close to the stick's taper? If not, my posts probably could do with more resolution.
Given the nature of forums and, especially, forums dealing with human perception and preference, it’s usually not long before the point one strongly agrees with is followed by another point from the same person one strongly disagrees with. Often it’s the next post, if not the next sentence.
853guy
Hey morricab,
Agree. Conflation of variables (as I mention above to Bonzo) is one of the single greatest problems apropos subjectivised preferential pursuits. I would include evaluation of all art forms of which recorded music reproduced via an electro-mechanical mechanism is obviously one, to...
Hey Bonzo,
Absolutely. Their "why" might be wrong for the right reasons or right for the wrong ones, i.e. they conflate one variable for another ('detail' for upper-mid hardness, or 'dynamics' for lack of dynamic range and vice versa). Any definition is only as useful as the insight of the...
Hello Al,
I don't disagree with you.
As a further attempt to clarify my thinking, I would posit music is pitch and amplitude over time. Each of those things is objectively measurable. 'Musicality' is the perception of pitch and amplitude over time, and as such, contextualised via subjectivised...
Just because we can apportion meaning to a concept does not mean we can articulate that meaning directly via other concepts.
Take ‘love’, as an example. We might perhaps all agree it possesses meaning, yet to describe what love is is both beyond science and reason.
Often, it is best...