a 'passive pre-amplifier', or rather a (shunt) resistor between DAC and AMP works fine. I can recommend Khozmo as one of the most neutral versions I've heard (and used with Z foil resistors).
The sonic difference between digital volume control and real colume control is quite real IME, Metrum...
I'd say that taking the Koenigsegg to Munich High End over the German Autobahn would be best of both worlds...one would need a dash of tranquilizers upon arrival in order to aprreciate sound I guess..
That is the beauty of designing your own speaker, one can adapt and try things...
The Bionor does not really have a tweeter in it's original design, 500Hz and upwards are taken care of by the top horn (or horns for the Bionor II)
It IS adjustable, I agree it's not likely tuned in the horizontal...
Theoretically they are Kugelwellenhorns, patented for having a large phase coherent 'plug'
A calculated phase coherent speaker IMHO always sounds worse than a speaker that is physically time adjusted..call me silly but that is my preference and that of many who have heard the difference so far...
more so than most of what I heard at High End Munich last year...
I'll go for the setup I tested in my prototype, full range and a super tweeter rather than the 500Hz higher order crossover the horn.
the mind is indeed building a similar picture (I'd not call what I perceive ina concert hall as hologram at all), yet the way different systems do that is differing...and for me some ways work better than others, for others it'll be the other way around. I find phase/time coherence to be of...
indeed, the decca tree is a great set up
Yet we can discuss recordings until we're green around the nose, the thing is that the recording does not change when replayed with a vintage or modern speaker.
Overall I vastly prefer simpler recordings, they do not have to be early or old!
The modernistic stereo meccano construction box recording (and mastering) I usually leave alone.
Just listen to what Decca did in the early days of Stereo https://abbeyroadinstitute.co.uk/blog/the-decca-tree-the-secrets-behind-the-legendary-recording-technique/
Or the BBC recording training manual.
Leaving the recording methods/quirks out of the comparison as that stays the same for both...
while they will be different I tend to think that some speaker systems make the difference more pronounced than others...
And what is wrong with some good mono '-)
I've heard GREAT mono recordings played back with two speakers that probably painted a better 'picture' than many stereo recordings.
the one mentioned in my signature, A G2 connected single tube amp; PL519, effectively making it a mesh triode. something like 2.5W, plenty at something like 105dB/W/m
Peter , that is exactly what I was trying to refer to!
In our local concert hall I have seats in row 12, just about right for great 'soundstage' but it simply does not exist.
The energy fills the room, and it's almost true surround sound (without the horrible effects home theatres invented)
In...
My initial question leading to this quest was what the exact horn curve is...the patents drove me in the direction of a Kugelwellenhorn, later I found a patent for a hybrid curve....knowing the drawing is not scaled properly the question was there.
My trionor prototype is torn down before...
that I'll adapt as needed, but will stick to a large baffle and FLH design.
I think they sound great and quite natural, as expected, which is also enhanced when compared to the current high end 'sound fingerprint' which IMHO is overly detailed sound stage oriented.
My Bionor based 'Trionor'...
So, after all this time the quest has come to an end, I've analyzed all the measured data and done that again....the Bionor horn is not the magical part I once thought it was ...it's a mere segment of a circle.
My audio OCD would not let go but now I can, so the design for my in house system can...
the problem as I see it is that time is against us, for my espressomachine dating back to the fifties the engineers are already long dead..not much details are left. For a speaker or speaker chassis design going back to the 1920ies?
Patents are greatm yet they typically omit the finer detail and...
I'd LOVE to be able to make that comparison and then (after the fact ) be informed about the differences..I just fear that not enough specifics are known about the 1920 original to make it worthwhile....I suspect the 2022 repro was made under a lot of assumptions trying to get close to the...
Not having the drivers made of Zylon makes tha tpretty difficult...would love to, until now paper works best for me but I'm open to anything....wood was second best so far
I know how speaker cones made of Kevlar sound...pretty horrible at best IMHO, especially for tweeters
Stiffer does not mean it's harder than steel, hardness is measured in Rockwell... stiffness in tensile compression or young's modulus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zylon