I can't believe that we are still having this argument. I remember back in the 80s the heated discussions. As someone even then with a decent collection of baroque and early music - some of it quite rare at the time - I argued that CD would never catch on to the point where it would replace vinyl.
There was just too much really good stuff that it would never be economic to make and sell for £13 GBP a CD (full price records were about £5 at the time). In a way I was wrong but it took a good 15-20 years for the CD ecosystem in rarer/less mass-market music to match what it was on vinyl in the mid to late 80s, and it didn't last all that long as the world of streaming - again focused in its early says on the mass-market - began to cannibalise the marketplace.
Of course vinyl in the classical world is now dominated by re-releases of big name orchestral potboiler stuff often previously made famous by 'collectors' (some of them inexplicably in my view), or by a few heavily promoted releases by the big labels, some of them downright awful (in the latest example, I would argue that Lang Lang should face a firing squad, along with whoever his producer was at DG, for crimes against humanity as well as against the Goldberg Variations). It's almost impossible to get new early music on vinyl, though quite a bit is still being made on CD.
Anwyay, it seems that baroque, renaissance and medieval music collection on vinyl may never be adequately replaced. All of which is a very long-winded way of saying - I don't think it's possible for some of us to move to digtal, regardless how good it gets. Over the years I have become reconciled to the CD. But I doubt I will ever take to the notion of 'playlists' or the idea that to listen to music, I have to use a computer screen. For me the lack of a tactile connection easily cancels out any 'convenience' or, indeed, any sonic advances from file based or streamed replay.