rbbert
Don't feel flustered, I felt the same way a few yrs ago, for serious listening it was not.
Don't feel flustered, I felt the same way a few yrs ago, for serious listening it was not.
for serious listening it was not.
My CPU's don't play music, at least not intentionally. They compute well, though.
Looking to see If it has advanced to be worth time and effort.Ah, I thought this tread was about computer audio...![]()
Looking to see If it has advanced to be worth time and effort.
Looking to see If it has advanced to be worth time and effort.
Not lately, I gave up. I did as I said a few yrs ago, wasn't worth my time.If you don't use a computer to play music, then how can you compare the two?
It has, but it still takes time and effort. Don't expect any old computer plugged into even an exceptional DAC to give you the musical pleasure your CD/SACD transport is currently giving you. And yet, with the time and effort, the same DAC can sound better with a computer feeding it than the transport.
The difficult question - did anyone develop a music server that could surpass the DCS Vivaldi CD transport used with its own DAC?![]()
Gary,
My main concern is the time and effort. Also is there a systematic and universal recipe, that is not dependent on specific brands and models, parts that are not easily available outside the US and will assure some continuity?
The difficult question - did anyone develop a music server that could surpass the DCS Vivaldi CD transport used with its own DAC?![]()
It has, but it still takes time and effort. Don't expect any old computer plugged into even an exceptional DAC to give you the musical pleasure your CD/SACD transport is currently giving you. And yet, with the time and effort, the same DAC can sound better with a computer feeding it than the transport.
True, too cheap and too much plastic
...
Gary,
My main concern is the time and effort. Also is there a systematic and universal recipe, that is not dependent on specific brands and models, parts that are not easily available outside the US and will assure some continuity?
The difficult question - did anyone develop a music server that could surpass the DCS Vivaldi CD transport used with its own DAC?![]()
My Mac mini (as well as an old MacBook Pro) are almost as good as my MSB Universal Transport, feeding into the MSB Diamond DAC.
"Almost" is not "as good as", and I know that, and I'm perfectly fine with that, since the mini costs a lot less than the transport, does a whole lot more, and allows me a whole new way of listening to music.
There are lots of reports of folks that moved on to CAPS servers, and that those are considerably better than a Mac mini. So, in the end, the computer might just as well be better than the MSB Transport.
And I don't see a reason why it can't be the same with the dCS stuff. At US$ 40k, that transport better beat a $2k server, but I don't think it would.
alexandre
With an eye toward the future, I personally believe that time spent learning about and developing CA is necessary & worthwhile for audio lovers.
Remember that each new music delivery medium has undergone an evolutionary progression, and CA will be the same.
Lee
As far as CD storage, nice oak dowel shelves which can hold ~1500 discs cost just over $100. It takes me at most 5-10 seconds to find a disc I want, perhaps another 5 to load it. I've played with a few dedicated music servers; none of them will search 12,000 discs (which is certainly more than 4 TB compressed) and load the title to play in that time.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |