I'm not sure a $170K turntable will outsell tape machines 10:1. And people with $170K to spend on a turntable have many choices, each claiming superiority over the others. Moreover, most of these people probably already have a top end TT. However, there are few choices for people who want a top-end tape machine that is plug and play, and has spare parts, manufacturer warranty and after sales servicing. My Nagra TA broke down recently and I had nobody to turn to. My tech at Nagra had retired, but in the end, he was able to talk me through and diagnosed the problem.
And I daresay my Nagra T Audio, with my DIY tape head preamp, will outperform any turntable on the planet, except perhaps direct to disc LP recordings, which might stand a chance of competing. The reason is, however good the TT is, it cannot get around the fact that towards the end of an LP side, the amount of information retrieved diminishes due to slower groove velocity. It cannot get around the mechanical problems associated with the tonearm/cartridge/cantilever interface, unless you use an optical cartridge, or better, a laser turntable. And most of the LPs are produced with a process that involves 3 stages of electroplating, with losses during each phase. You only need to compare the lacquer with the test pressing to notice the difference, and the lacquer is cut from a tape, so it can only equal the tape but not surpass it. Therefore, with $170K, I would spend perhaps $50K for the machine and the rest on tapes. I have about 300 titles, mostly copies from production or safety masters, and some commercial ones made directly from edited work parts, covering pretty much most of the music I listen to regularly. For other music, I just use streaming services and LPs.