Hahahaha the shit that gets postedmiglto wrote to me and believes that Live in Paris is an analog recording, as he believes that Al Schmitt did not start recording in digital until around 2007.
For what it's worth, and it's probably not worth much, I don't think a digital recording from 2001 would sound as good as what I hear on this ORG LP.
I was preparing to write to Al Schmitt directly and ask him about this matter, but he died three years ago.
I rather listen to a studio than live album of hers. I find her voice to be too limited for a live performance. She benefits from more production offered by a studio recording...but that's just me. Check out her studio recordings as well and decide for yourself. Aside for my issue with her voice, that live album captures the concert ambiance, piano and rest of the musicians nicely.
She covers a lot of good songs.
Don’t think “infliction” is the word you meant to use. Quite the opposite.Her voice is hard to capture , very nuanced with plenty inflictions , under powered systems will hear her shouty , too damped as bad tone , poor Timbre and she sounds nasal ..!
Just saying
Let me give it some thought.That's great! Why don't you start a new thread, and tell us about your system? There's a lot of love for tubes and vinyl and panel speakers here, as you know!
Her voice is hard to capture , very nuanced with plenty inflictions , under powered systems will hear her shouty , too damped as bad tone , poor Timbre and she sounds nasal ..!
Just saying
What you stated is absolutely correct and Patricia barber is tough too.Her voice is hard to capture , very nuanced with plenty inflictions , under powered systems will hear her shouty , too damped as bad tone , poor Timbre and she sounds nasal ..!
Just saying
I agree. She has a very limited range and she does not have the kind of control that would make other divas jealous.I'm not talking about sound quality here.
Don’t think “infliction” is the word you meant to use. Quite the opposite.
Diana Krall live in Paris is a great record both performance wise and sound wise. At least from my perspective. And apparently many other people. One of the better live recordings.I'm not talking about sound quality here.
Because my starting philosophy is traditional purist. My starting philosophy is that all else being equal, nothing good comes from converting an analog waveform to digital and then back to analog to hear the music.Ron, why does it matter to you if the recording is analog or digital?
Where did I say I could not tell by listening to it? I was told it is a digital recording. The reason I started this inquiry is because it totally did not sound digital to me.If you can not tell by listening to it
Because my starting philosophy is traditional purist. My starting philosophy is that all else being equal, nothing good comes from converting an analog waveform to digital and then back to analog to hear the music.
Where did I say I could not tell by listening to it? I was told it is a digital recording. The reason I started this inquiry is because it totally did not sound digital to me.
Having seen her live, I can understand how the full package in that setting is attractive. I don't find her voice harsh at home or live, but she just doesn't reach me. I do think the technical part of her singing has improved over time. As you say, all very personal. There are other well-considered singers (both male and female) who don't do it for me. Same with musicians. Luckily, many artists are making art and having streaming access to hundreds of thousands of albums never leaves one wanting.Diana Krall live in Paris is a great record both performance wise and sound wise. At least from my perspective. And apparently many other people. One of the better live recordings.
I get some people don’t like her voice or music. I heard Peter Mcgraph ( sorry about spelling) of Wilson audio call her Diana scratch my fingers on blackboard. Lol. But I can’t disagree more. Have all her records on CD and LP. For the most part VERY well recorded and well performed. That’s part of what’s great about our hobby. We all have our own preferences!!!
Have you heard the Mofi UD One Steps? Some of the best remasters ever, A -> D-> A.Because my starting philosophy is traditional purist. My starting philosophy is that all else being equal, nothing good comes from converting an analog waveform to digital and then back to analog to hear the music.
Yes. I sold all of my Mo-Fi undisclosed digital transfer LPs.Have you heard the Mofi UD One Steps?
I will be interested to read which format it is when you determine the answer.
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |