SUB with 1.7i

ksaudiophile

New Member
Oct 15, 2018
1
0
1
59
Hello,
This is my first post here.... I just joined the forum.

I purchased my 1.7i almost a year ago. Since then I've played with DACs and preamps... I'm afflicted with the dreaded Audiophile upgraditis bug... ;)

Yesterday, I was playing around with subs setup in my home theater.... I have several NHT subs. One of the subs was an 'oddball'.... a 10" ... the others are 12".

So... I had an idea. I took it into my listening room and put it center between my Maggie's... it has speaker level inputs AND outputs. I ran 12TC from my Bryston 4b to the sub and then an additional pair from the outputs of the sub to the 1.7i's. The x-over set to 50hz .... after much listening.

This is friggin amazing!! I'm guessing it's got something to do with the Bryston really liking the load it's seeing.... THIS SOUNDS GREAT!!!
Image dead center... soundstage go's far beyond my walls of my 12' x 21' room. The Maggie's are singing like I've never heard them before! I didn't expect this...

Magnepan... make a sub!!! A real sub.... just try it... please.

BTW... I've used subs with my Maggies before using line level inputs and running the Maggies full range... just sounded like you would expect... like a sub following three steps behind.
This is musical... and the Maggies opened up like never before... it's wonderful. I don't have other amps to switch out, so I can't test my 'load' theory....

But... this sounds good...

I know... take the pill...
 

DonH50

Member Sponsor & WBF Technical Expert
Jun 22, 2010
3,947
306
1,670
Monument, CO
Welcome to WBF!

I made my own servo sub decades ago to mate with my MG-I's. I have always felt subs complement the sound and add to the music. Maggies distort heavily (tens of percent) when driven with large bass signals, so especially need a sub, but one that does not ring and muddy the bass. I don't think the Bryston cares much about the reduced load, but the panels most certainly will like not dealing with deep bass. Offloading the low-frequency signals from the panels makes them much more linear and adds much-desirable headroom for the higher stuff where they can do their magic. It's hard to believe how much better the panels sound when they are not constantly pushed past their limits by deep bass.

When I rebuilt my system and brought my old MG-IIIa's out of storage I looked around at subs, heard a few, and ended up with Rythmik subs. They are also servo, using a similar circuit to my old design (which I like better than the accelerometer-based Velodyne approach), but much improved (and with a new patent -- should have patented my idea way back when!)

Personally I would cross 1.7's higher than 50 Hz, up around 80 Hz (an octave above their LF corner), to reduce the load on them and shift it to the sub that is designed for it.

All IME/IMO - Don
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing