I have a couple of times at the Capital Audiofest. I have known Mark Conti since the 90’s And actually have his old speakers, Impact in my HT system. his current speakers show potential. Have not heard the latest iteration though. I will have to give him a call.
An interesting selection of equipment in company with some relaxed interviewing...I would have liked to hear a little audio quality footage of the speakers in action tho.
As this was our first video effort with untried equipment we definitely were not up for the additional and separate equipment requirements of the high quality recording portion of the WBF video project. By this I mean we did not want to carry and repeatedly set up the two Earthworks flat frequency response microphones.
Also, even if we did employ that other set of equipment I don't think we can get sufficiently background noise free audio unless the exhibition room is briefly closed for our exclusive use.
T.H.E Show ticket sales surpassed both 2019 and 2018! Imo THAT is a very good omen!!
And I THOROUGHLY ENJOYED your interviews - you picked three EXTREMELY interesting speakers to delve into, speakers that I am very glad to have learned more about. That MC Audiotech Forty-Ten has a lot of innovation going on, and I really like the designer's approach to combining multiple drivers which cover the upper frequency range. Imo THAT is the geometry to use, if you can. You see it sometimes in prosound but I don't recall seeing it done in home audio before.
Thank you and Tinka and Steve and Julian for producing this.
Bozak used an array of drivers in a similar Wayne course bass was handled differently. There were others too just don’t recall the brands right now, some were like a multifaceted ball for 360 dispersion but the 40-10 seems to have a new custom transducer and the array was chosen as a match for them. Would be interesting to see the impedance measurements to know how easy they are to drive but in any case efficiency claims for half a speaker is a ruse! One that really gets me! To add insult to injury he claims that you can use any solid state amp of sufficient power, whatever that means, for high end sound as if bass doesn’t require quality! So any two amps from any technology and quality will blend in?
. . . he claims that you can use any solid state amp of sufficient power, whatever that means, for high end sound as if bass doesn’t require quality! So any two amps from any technology and quality will blend in?
He is a loudspeaker manufacturer, and I interpreted his comment simply to suggest that the Forty-10 speaker is flexible, easy-to-drive, and not fussy in its amplifier requirements. To prove this, his entire electronics chain was modest price-wise and light weight-wise.
He is a loudspeaker manufacturer, and I interpreted his comment simply to suggest that the Forty-10 speaker is flexible, easy-to-drive, and not fussy in its amplifier requirements. To prove this, his entire electronics chain was modest price-wise and light weight-wise.
As this was our first video effort with untried equipment we definitely were not up for the additional and separate equipment requirements of the high quality recording portion of the WBF video project. By this I mean we did not want to carry and repeatedly set up the two Earthworks flat frequency response microphones.
Also, even if we did employ that other set of equipment I don't think we can get sufficiently background noise free audio unless the exhibition room is briefly closed for our exclusive use.
Oh...entirely understandable Ron..I look forward to a day when you might be better set up and in circumstances more conducive to such performance specific recordings.
Focusing on the video report recording process I did not have the opportunity to sit there for an extended period of time and listen leisurely to my usual tracks.
With that caveat, I thought the speaker sounded fantastic, and very promising. Otherwise I would not have requested an interview with the designer.
I thought the speaker exhibited unusually natural off-access response. I think it had a lot of the openness of a planar.
I like that it is a sensitive speaker. (I, personally, am pretty much unsympathetic to low sensitivity, multi-way, complex-crossover cones in boxes these days -- except for the top-of-the-line contenders in that topology.)
In the $40,000 range, I think I would prefer this speaker over any competing conventional, multi-way, complex cross-over cone speaker.
Focusing on the video report recording process I did not have the opportunity to sit there for an extended period of time and listen leisurely to my usual tracks.
With that caveat, I thought the speaker sounded fantastic, and very promising. Otherwise I would not have requested an interview with the designer.
I thought the speaker exhibited unusually natural off-access response. I think it had a lot of the openness of a planar.
I like that it is a sensitive speaker. (I, personally, am pretty much unsympathetic to low sensitivity, multi-way, complex-crossover cones in boxes these days -- except for the top-of-the-line contenders in that topology.)
In the $40,000 range, I think I would prefer this speaker over any competing conventional, multi-way, complex cross-over cone speaker.
Dear Ron,
It might be a fine speaker but at best and depending on its impedance characteristics, only half of it might be easy to drive but as a whole it’s definitely not a sensitive speaker. Those twin 18” woofers in a vented cabinet will consume plenty of current to make bass and you HAVE to match the two halves with similar or same electronics, something people should be aware of and consider in the overall cost.
Focusing on the video report recording process I did not have the opportunity to sit there for an extended period of time and listen leisurely to my usual tracks.
With that caveat, I thought the speaker sounded fantastic, and very promising. Otherwise I would not have requested an interview with the designer.
I thought the speaker exhibited unusually natural off-access response. I think it had a lot of the openness of a planar.
I like that it is a sensitive speaker. (I, personally, am pretty much unsympathetic to low sensitivity, multi-way, complex-crossover cones in boxes these days -- except for the top-of-the-line contenders in that topology.)
In the $40,000 range, I think I would prefer this speaker over any competing conventional, multi-way, complex cross-over cone speaker.
This is very interesting to know - did you somehow prepare for the interviews? Did you have a general concept of what do you want to ask or did you commit some precise notes with questions?
It looks like you were really well prepared, so my question would be - was it a matter of preparation, industry knowledge or just good acting? I guess you weren't that much stressed, were you?
This is very interesting to know - did you somehow prepare for the interviews? Did you have a general concept of what do you want to ask or did you commit some precise notes with questions?
It looks like you were really well prepared, so my question would be - was it a matter of preparation, industry knowledge or just good acting? I guess you weren't that much stressed, were you?
I am pretty happy with the first video. Next time we will try to avoid jerky camera motions. I have to remember not to wear round-neck shirts which slightly muffle my mic audio.
Yes, the next video will be a member visit and interview. We will be planning this visit in the next few weeks.
I am pretty happy with the first video. Next time we will try to avoid jerky camera motions. I have to remember not to wear round-neck shirts which slightly muffle my mic audio.