That vacuously inane threads like this one are entirely pointless .What seems to be the consensus around here ?
Let him down gently won’t you.That vacuously inane threads like this one are entirely pointless .
I think Wilson has the most fanboys.
... and fangirls. My wife chose Wilson. She saw them in the store window display. She liked the colour.
So we booked in for a demo 12:00 on a Saturday and lunch at 13:00 at a favourite restaurant opposite. We were early for lunch.
If I remember it right, In The Wilson Way book David’s wife (Sheryl Lee (sp?)) tells a story where one of her friends wants to buy some speakers for her audiophile husband.... and fangirls. My wife chose Wilson. She saw them in the store window display. She liked the colour.
So we booked in for a demo 12:00 on a Saturday and lunch at 13:00 at a favourite restaurant opposite. We were early for lunch.
I truly don't understand the lover versus hater polarization when applied to something like a high-end audio loudspeaker. Is "hater" used merely as hyperbole and internet exaggeration borrowed from polarization in other aspects of life outside of audio?
I totally get "loving" a speaker. I'm sure -- I would hope -- we all love our own speakers, which is why we selected them. But I don't "hate" loudspeakers I didn't select; I just don't care for them. They are not my cup of tea. I am not interested in them. I don't care to spend time with them.
The intensity of my interest, or more accurately, disinterest, in speakers I don't care for certainly does not rise to a level of emotional intensity which could be described accurately as "hate." How can a mild emotion like disinterest or apathy about a hobby product be amplified into, or reasonably be described as, "hate"?
...probably just "internet" hate, not real hate, which is reserved for Brussel sprouts, people who talk on cell-phones in restaurants, and leaf-blowers.How can a mild emotion like disinterest or apathy about a hobby product be amplified into, or reasonably be described as, "hate"?
I totally understand loving the appearance of the original WAMM. It was a beautiful assemblage and totally unique. But sometime after that Wilson abandoned wood veneers and went to automotive paint, a move I just don’t understand. Different strokes for different folks I guess.If I remember it right, In The Wilson Way book David’s wife (Sheryl Lee (sp?)) tells a story where one of her friends wants to buy some speakers for her audiophile husband.
Sheryl Lee invites her over to listen to the WAMs while they chat about her preferences.
They walk into the listening room and without hearing a note, the friend is overwhelmed by the beauty of the WAMs and decides that’s what she wants.
The Wilson custom colors can add $10k to the cost, but at that level (mid to upper six figures), what’s another 1 or 2 in the second digit from the left?
Wilson certainly has lovers and haters. Until I heard a decent demo, I was a Wilson agnostic. I was never a hater … but now, after demos good enough to show them off, I’m a very happy owner. YMMV
I went to a demo once, the system was well over $500,000 and the speakers about $120,000, so I may have had expectations of enjoying it. I found the speakers so overbearing I left after 10 minutes. "Hate" is an emotional description that is a short-cut to actually trying explain what I didn't like. But then it's not necessary to get poetic describing the sensation of being hit repeatedly on the head with a mallet.I truly don't understand the lover versus hater polarization when applied to something like a high-end audio loudspeaker. Is "hater" used merely as hyperbole and internet exaggeration borrowed from polarization in other aspects of life outside of audio?
I totally get "loving" a speaker. I'm sure -- I would hope -- we all love our own speakers, which is why we selected them. But I don't "hate" loudspeakers I didn't select; I just don't care for them. They are not my cup of tea. I am not interested in them. I don't care to spend time with them.
The intensity of my interest, or more accurately, disinterest, in speakers I don't care for certainly does not rise to a level of emotional intensity which could be described accurately as "hate." How can a mild emotion like disinterest or apathy about a hobby product be amplified into, or reasonably be described as, "hate"?
Not if the colour is exactly the one the wife wanted, or should I say, was within the limited range of options she might consider.The Wilson custom colors can add $10k
Fair enough!I have to say that my wife hates the look of a lot of high end speakers - she hates Wilsons the most (calls them Daleks).
I often look at posters' equipment lists in signatures. They tell me a lot.Look at contributors sigs. You'll start to see we all like what we like. There's a bit of Chevy vs Ford, ahem, Ford vs Chevy crap that happens here, but it usually flames out pretty quick. As long as the speakers cost 6 figures they get interest here.
I truly don't understand the lover versus hater polarization when applied to something like a high-end audio loudspeaker. Is "hater" used merely as hyperbole and internet exaggeration borrowed from polarization in other aspects of life outside of audio? (...)
In real world the aficionados I know do not show such behavior.