After 2 weeks ago I heard a pair of ARC Ref 210's using KT 120's. Also in the system were an ARC Ref 5, CD 8, DAC 8, Nola Baby Grands and the latest MIT IC's and speaker wire (whatever that means). I realize that there were many variable in this system, including probably insufficient burn-in time , BUT I was seriously unimpressed, as were most of the other people at the demonstration (about 20 people). We all felt that it sounded like a system and not music, but then that might have changed with more burn-in time.
What struck me the most as a long time fan of KT88 sound versus 6550 sound, is that the sound of that system, possibly the tubes, sounded very much like a slightly sweeter 6550, with allegedly more power (hard to determine because we were not at the amp's limits) but unlike any KT88 I ever heard, and to my liking much less involving.
I know that the subject of listening room has been a hot topic on this site recently. I have some familiarity with the listening room in which I heard the previously mentioned system and must say that I heard set of Paradigm Signature Ref 8's, driven by a pair of Bryston 28's, Bryston preamp and CD in the same room recently. The Paradigm Byrston combo was exciting has still, several months later, has me wanting more, while the fore mentioned system was completely uninvolving, albeit not offensive. And, BTW, I am a dipole and tube lover!