Ron's Speaker, Turntable, Power and Room Treatment Upgrades

That lightbulb moment correlating radio with digital streaming can't be far off.

Believe it already has in the car and elsewhere outside the home?

I’m not following you. Radio I am very comfortable with.

6AAA2EC8-0051-452C-B75B-46F664F9183C.jpeg
 
I found in inventory a $99 Sony CD/SACD player. It has a digital output, so I could use it as a transport.

But I have been looking forward to off-loading the CDs to Salvation Army for a tax deduction.

The jitter structure of most cheap players creates a very disagreeable and nasty sound signatute when listening in an high resolution system. If going this way I suggest something with a Philips mechanism, such as the old Marantz CD players. In general these players had less resolution but had a fuller, more inoffensive sound. Or get a vintage Madrigal Proceed transport or player - they go cheap and are nice sounding.

Also remember the SACD DSD layer can't be played in the Lampizator.
 
I’m not following you. Radio I am very comfortable with.

Somehow I missed your plans to implement a streaming sub-system which has been discussed in recent posts.

I hope you find your DAC and any other related equipment to be a good match within a room and system you have yet to assemble together. A discarded Sony BDP or Playstation might yet prove to be worthwhile fun during your investigative period. If the CD's fate wasn't already signed off on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Resnick
The jitter structure of most cheap players creates a very disagreeable and nasty sound signatute when listening in an high resolution system. If going this way I suggest something with a Philips mechanism, such as the old Marantz CD players. In general these players had less resolution but had a fuller, more inoffensive sound. Or get a vintage Madrigal Proceed transport or player - they go cheap and are nice sounding.

Also remember the SACD DSD layer can't be played in the Lampizator.

Why would I want to bypass a Lampizator DAC?

What about for a dedicated CD transport the Audiolab 6000CDT or the Cambridge Audio CXC V2? The Audiolab claims to have some sort of jitter reducing buffer.
 
Having just listened a few times to an album I discovered this morning (Patty Smyth’s It’s About Time https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/patty-smyth’s-it’s-about-time.35622/) which is available only on CD, I suddenly had the very weird thought that maybe I should get a CD transport, and not get rid of my couple of hundred CDs?o_O

I guess I should find an analog thermometer and check my temperature.

Why would I want to bypass a Lampizator DAC?

What about for a dedicated CD transport the Audiolab 6000CDT or the Cambridge Audio CXC V2? The Audiolab claims to have some sort of jitter reducing buffer.
how serious are you wanting to get, for 'a couple hundred CD's"?

are you interested in just having the CD music for 'visitors'? or serious listening? it seems you really don't know where you are going. so others assume what they want to assume about it. and you will get all sorts of levels of suggestions.

like i mentioned, a retired Oppo from my HT, fills the bill perfectly for a random CD player to use. and i have 4000 CD's in my room. sure you could spend lots on an exotic transport for the Lampi? for what purpose exactly? i have no intensions of connecting my Oppo to my Wadax for the odd CD once in a 'very long' while.
 
how serious are you wanting to get, for 'a couple hundred CD's"?

are you interested in just having the CD music for 'visitors'? or serious listening? it seems you really don't know where you are going. so others assume what they want to assume about it. and you will get all sorts of levels of suggestions.

like i mentioned, a retired Oppo from my HT, fills the bill perfectly for a random CD player to use. and i have 4000 CD's in my room. sure you could spend lots on an exotic transport for the Lampi? for what purpose exactly? i have no intensions of connecting my Oppo to my Wadax for the odd CD once in a 'very long' while.

All excellent questions and comments, Mike! 4,000 CDs? Wow!

How serious? Only $300 serious. That’s all. I just bid for a CD transport, for $300, on Audiogon.

I like the belt-drive CEC transports, but there is no reason to go to that level for, as you find, the rare selection of a CD for personal playback enjoyment.

I think I’m going to “split the baby” and cull the CD collection and donate about half of the CDs and take a tax deduction, and keep the other half of CDs. I will donate the CDs of titles of which I have multiple copies on vinyl. I have been actively selling sealed records which are exact duplicates or near duplicates (keeping a 180g and selling a 200g record of the same title by the same re-issue outfit), so I think I will have some free space left in the new wall-mounted record/tape storage unit.

I have no interest in having CDs for visitors. I will keep the CDs of digital recordings (as my general philosophy is to play recordings in their native format). And I will keep CDs of oddities and one-hit wonders which I don’t have on vinyl.
 
Last edited:
Did Schitt ever actually release a CD transport after rumors to that effect?
 
Why would I want to bypass a Lampizator DAC?

What about for a dedicated CD transport the Audiolab 6000CDT or the Cambridge Audio CXC V2? The Audiolab claims to have some sort of jitter reducing buffer.

No one talks about bypassing the Lampizator DAC - the type of CD players I referred had a coaxial SPDIF output.

No experience with the transports you refer, but most inexpensive non vintage CD transports and players use CD-ROM readers, known for average sound quality. IMHO anti-jitter can´t replace a quality transport.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lagonda
Had a Cambridge CXC, decent transport for the money, but if you want the SQ of a "high end" DAC to flow through one needs a quality transport.
 
No one talks about bypassing the Lampizator DAC - the type of CD players I referred had a coaxial SPDIF output.

No experience with the transports you refer, but most inexpensive non vintage CD transports and players use CD-ROM readers, known for average sound quality. IMHO anti-jitter can´t replace a quality transport.
that's why I recommended the Pioneer dvd. read through what Lukasz wrote about it. with small mods the the plays at 10,000 € level plays dvd audio, sacd. what more do you want. Without mods really good not worldclass.
 
I may be getting carried away here, but I’ve obtained a second turntable/tonearm/cartridge combination!
 
The jitter structure of most cheap players creates a very disagreeable and nasty sound signatute when listening in an high resolution system. If going this way I suggest something with a Philips mechanism, such as the old Marantz CD players. In general these players had less resolution but had a fuller, more inoffensive sound. Or get a vintage Madrigal Proceed transport or player - they go cheap and are nice sounding.

Also remember the SACD DSD layer can't be played in the Lampizator.
Actually if the CDP has an HDMI output there are boxes (one made by Geerfab called d.bob) that provide DoP via S/PDIF. It makes CDs and SACDs sound pretty good running through my Holo Audio May DAC.
 
I may be getting carried away here, but I’ve obtained a second turntable/tonearm/cartridge combination!
Carried away? In audio? Never!:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Resnick
95FCFE26-D05B-44A3-8039-F95D99B022F7.jpeg


D03DDAF2-666A-4482-A7E8-3FC0F3037322.jpeg
 
I may use this front-end (on disposable records) until the AS-2000 arrives.
 
Actually if the CDP has an HDMI output there are boxes (one made by Geerfab called d.bob) that provide DoP via S/PDIF. It makes CDs and SACDs sound pretty good running through my Holo Audio May DAC.

They only support a few CD players - see https://geerfab.com/audio/system-requirements/ for the list and the box is expensive( $999 in the US, as far as I could see) . But this a very interesting development.
 
How serious? Only $300 serious. That’s all. I just bid for a CD transport, for $300, on Audiogon.
(...)
I have no interest in having CDs for visitors. I will keep the CDs of digital recordings (as my general philosophy is to play recordings in their native format). And I will keep CDs of oddities and one-hit wonders which I don’t have on vinyl.
I cannot but echo Mike Lavigne's take on this. Indeed, regarding the 100-150(?) CDs left after the sorting, I would use the CDP (or a dvd as suggested) as transport and connect it to the DAC.
...Which is what I'm doing with very acceptable results and I have around 2000 cd many of which I have not ripped (whenever I set up to actually do it, something better to do invariably pops up!).
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Co-Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing