It would be a hassle, and a fair bit of work, but it appears that you are in a good position to compare these two fine tonearms, should you be inclined? Same cartridge set up on each, then the other cartridge set up on each? Just a thought.
Occasionally, I am taken back by how good my tv can sound. Mind you, tv’s have come a long way over the years. When I was a kid tv pictures were only in black and white, you changed the channels manually and usually had to adjust horizontal and vertical tracking each time you did. Spent quality...
I must amend my last opinion about”Original Source “ recordings from Deutsche Gramophone. Since writing the above, I have replaced my Ayon Spitfire integrated with an Ongaku tribute 211 amp built by Ken at OTOMON Labs in Japan. Now the Carlos Kleiber (Beethoven Symphony Nr. 7) is MUCH more...
Um, as TV’s and CD’s are both digital, why would I be astounded if a concert played live over my TV sounded better than a CD player playing a recording? Why wouldn’t a TV sound better?
Let me reiterate: After listening to different SET amps (2A3’s, 300B’s, 211’s etc.) on Youtube on my computer...
I have downloaded many of the Avalon bands‘ videos. I love Tatiana Eva-Marie and really wish that one of the top-flight analogue engineers (like Kevin Grey at Coherent Audio) would cut some vinyl of them (suspect would end up being one of those classic high demand records).
I don’t think it is that you and I hear any better than anyone else, but differently perhaps. I am now certain that many people on this website can not hear a difference between digital and analogue, which is not to say one is any better than the other, just that to some of us, maybe a minority...
What is the difference in “resolution” between TV and Youtube?
JackD201 pointed out that Youtube sound was 300ish mbps MP3 (I think he meant to say 300ish kbps but we know what he meant). CD puts out 1411ish kbps, but I never thought the sound from CD any more “real” sounding than MP-3. I...
I believe Al M. #3 response could very well be onto something when he says that the visual part of TV has an effect on the mind that allows it to fill in what isn’t there. Guesswork here, but it sounds logical as a contributing factor.
I said all the YouTube vids sounded worse (as far as tone realness) than my t.v., that is except for a 4212 SET amp built by Ken Uesugi and demonstrated on his Otomon labs website :
That video of the 4212 SET amps playing a recording of electric piano and cello, despite being recorded to a...
That’s right, it is in plain English. YouTube on the iMac and Original Source on my (apparently crappy) hi fi .
The tone of violins and even piano from my Sony Bravia was more real sounding (truer to tone, not as harsh as the YouTube, more present than the Original Source) from the TV. I posted...
My two channel system does beat TV, Another Johnson misunderstood my original post.
All I wanted to do is point out how well my unadulterated TV can realistically reproduce the sound/tone of violins, piano and some other analogue instruments. Better, IMHO, than iPhone videos of world class...
Three prong UK plugs, power to hi fi is through dedicated circuit off mains, shielded cable and Furutech sockets and plugs. Although I have “audiophile” power cords, I personally detected no difference (other than size and cost) from stock cords.
Interesting point, and I will try the experiment as you suggest.
But in regards to seeing the instruments playing somehow allowing me to "fill in" how it is supposed to sound, why not seeing the megabuck "best sound of the show" system playing in front of audiophiles on chairs convincing my...
This was the response I expected I would get first. No, my TV is good (Sony Bravia Smart 4K Ultra HD OLED) but not incredibly great (no surround sound, speaker is the screen of the TV).
I am talking about which comes closest to the actual tone of acoustic instruments, the phone recordings of...
Some of the Norfolk folk I have met, after hearing you call them by a different name repeatedly, would probably assume that you were correct and that they had got it wrong for all those years.