Search results
-
Y
Whither MQA
Just checking, was that the one where they demonstrated MQA's "superiority" against MP3's (and forgot to tell the audience they were comparing MQA to MP3 ? Just glad to see a shady (put mildly) go away.- Yahooboy
- Post #106
- Forum: Digital Audio Forum: DAC, Transports, Digital Processing Forum
-
Y
Whither MQA
Lee this article might be of interest, remember it's no shame to ask for help https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/basics/denial -
Y
State of the industry - Roy Gregory Editorial
And has pulled John Atkinson et al with him in the fall It seems a lot of these mqa proponents are suffering hard with the Stockholm syndrom- Yahooboy
- Post #15
- Forum: General Audio Forum
-
Y
Isn't mqa just another kind of mp3?
It isn't apparent from this one measurement. But when You look at a lot of different measurements. You will see that each and everyone of the MQA files have the same frequency responce above 22-24 kHz, with no relation to the original file. If You zoom in on this picture You will also note the... -
Y
Isn't mqa just another kind of mp3?
Yup, the only lossy 17/44-48 "codec" posing as a lossless 24/up to 384 format. (Don't even mention the latest "upgrades to Tidal 16/44 MQA - actually even worse around actual 13 resolution) -
Y
Isn't mqa just another kind of mp3?
When You look a little deeper You will discover that it is indeed MP3 v2 Look at the measurements the exact same master. I think these graphs speak for themselves Blue one is the Original DXD (24/352,8) Red is MQA decoded (for instance Tidal app - 17/44-48 upsampled once) Green is MQA renderer...
 | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator |  | Ron Resnick Site Co-Owner | Administrator |  | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |