Thanks your reply Tima. I hope someone who used 6N6P with REF3 and post their review here I appreciate.I have not tried that. Having owned several modern ARC comonents (Ref 2, 2SE, 3, 10 Phono, and 5SE and 10 Linestage) I will speculate that the differences you hear between 6N6P and 6H30 in ARC phonotages will be pretty similar to the differences you hear between those tubes in ARC linestages. The 6N6P is relatively inexpensive so worthwhile to experiment if you want to hear for yourself.
It is good to know what the community is saying about our company, so I drop in to check the forums on WBF and provide information that may be useful.It is interesting to have somebody from Audio Research comment on this thread. But I have owned an ARC 5SE Reference preamp for a little over a year. It came with 6H30 tubes. When I switched to 6N6P tubes (except for the 6H30 used with the 6550) I found I liked the sound quite a bit better. I thought the music had more dynamics and tonal color. I started having a problem with the 5SE triggering the overload protection on my PS Audio BHK 300 monoblocks so I replaced all of the tubes this time sticking with the 6H30 in all the positions. After 7-10 days of hoping the tubes simply needed to burn in and the 5SE would start sounding good again, I switched back to using 4 6N6P tubes. Immediately, I got the improvement I was looking for. Maybe I just like a tube that "performs notably poorer than the factory-selected 6H30P" LOL.
Good to know that the 6N6P won't damage anything from an electrical standpoint. I did worry about that. And I think it is likely that the 6N6P has a shorter life than the 6H30. Since they are still relatively cheap that isn't a concern.