Our right to exercise free will has been reaffirmed. Of course the right to prove scientifically that we are not really hearing anything is reserved. Audiophiles love their distortion. Tube and vinyl delivers it in spades. One could conclude then what they are reall saying is we are free to indulge our singular or collective delusions. No they don't use the term delusion. What is it when you hear something that is not real? Auditory illusions (hearing voices) can be the basis for psychosis. Our delusions are basically harmless the tell us. No harm no foul. Other than being separated from some hard earned cash, no animals were injured.
I could paraphrase the Irish Spring commercial. "Manly yes but I like it ,too. Distortions yes, but I like it too. Words like warmth,euphonic. rolled off are offered as an olive branch. I understand why you like it. Science demands that I piont out it is just not accurate, To what? The source. Don't worry. After all you can do whatever you like. I'll just be over here trying to prove you are the victim of charlatans and snake oil salesman.Thqt is to say the differences you claim are not only inferior but often non-existent.
Sorry I am not buying it. I think they would love to see vinyl,tubes and the entire audiophile vocabulary disappear. They certainly would prefer to see some reviewers and manufacturers disappear. The attacks are vile, relentless and mostly based on anything but science. Vinl could disappear, Tubes could disappear. Ironically hi res and Redbook CD are under attack. It's good enough is the constant refrain.
When I call someone a flat earther , I mean someone who demands proof of issues that have already been settled. The challenger always wants another shut at the title. They make inconsistent arguments. People love distortion. OTOH The better it measures the more people like it.
I find it worrisome because it burns energy to defend it. Energy that could be used to advance the SOTA.
I could paraphrase the Irish Spring commercial. "Manly yes but I like it ,too. Distortions yes, but I like it too. Words like warmth,euphonic. rolled off are offered as an olive branch. I understand why you like it. Science demands that I piont out it is just not accurate, To what? The source. Don't worry. After all you can do whatever you like. I'll just be over here trying to prove you are the victim of charlatans and snake oil salesman.Thqt is to say the differences you claim are not only inferior but often non-existent.
Sorry I am not buying it. I think they would love to see vinyl,tubes and the entire audiophile vocabulary disappear. They certainly would prefer to see some reviewers and manufacturers disappear. The attacks are vile, relentless and mostly based on anything but science. Vinl could disappear, Tubes could disappear. Ironically hi res and Redbook CD are under attack. It's good enough is the constant refrain.
When I call someone a flat earther , I mean someone who demands proof of issues that have already been settled. The challenger always wants another shut at the title. They make inconsistent arguments. People love distortion. OTOH The better it measures the more people like it.
I find it worrisome because it burns energy to defend it. Energy that could be used to advance the SOTA.