(for those sufficiently deranged to believe such is possible ...)
First of all, a definition of such a state of beingness:
"Invisible tweeters" is just a shorthand for a greatly enlarged sweet spot; ultimately, nothing more or less than that -- it's a matter of degree, not of type, of quality of sound. Every audiophile who has a half-decent "rig" knows of the "sweet spot" animal -- it may be microscopically small, a head in a vice position, but it exists. And in it the tweeters are, or should be, "invisible"; your ear/brain can't pinpoint that sound is coming from the tweeter. Meaning, blindfolded, a person who didn't "know" where the tweeters were wouldn't be able to point to them accurately. And this is as good a definition as any, for what I mean by "invisible".
So in the context of this thread, what is aimed for is to achieve maximum expansion of this sweet spot. People who use good quality high power amplifiers, high efficiency speakers, active speakers of decent build, some better sorted out pro equipment are often very au fait with considerably enlarged sweet spots; they're well on the way.
So big should this sweet spot be? Well, we want the whole room to be able to characterised as such: remember, we are not changing the sound in any remarkable way, we're simply improving its quality bit by bit, so that the illusion of the invisible driver is not lost anywhere in the room -- no more, and no less than that.
A quick response to those who say that acoustically this is not possible: the argument is along the lines that the phase interference of the sound waves from the left and right speakers create the stereo effect, imaging, etc -- a construct of the brain. And I agree. Totally. But the thing is you do not have to be positioned absolutely precisely equidistant from the two speakers for this to happen. Otherwise, every audio system would have an almost microscopically small sweet spot: the head in a vice syndrome. So those systems that demonstrate an enlarged sweet spot indicate that the ear/brain is tolerant of that phase interference thingy going on, not being "perfect". Quite, quite tolerant, in fact. So what we need to do is exploit that tolerance, for all it's worth ...
...
to be continued ...
(don't worry, this is not going to stagnate, energies are going in another direction just at the moment ...)
Frank
First of all, a definition of such a state of beingness:
"Invisible tweeters" is just a shorthand for a greatly enlarged sweet spot; ultimately, nothing more or less than that -- it's a matter of degree, not of type, of quality of sound. Every audiophile who has a half-decent "rig" knows of the "sweet spot" animal -- it may be microscopically small, a head in a vice position, but it exists. And in it the tweeters are, or should be, "invisible"; your ear/brain can't pinpoint that sound is coming from the tweeter. Meaning, blindfolded, a person who didn't "know" where the tweeters were wouldn't be able to point to them accurately. And this is as good a definition as any, for what I mean by "invisible".
So in the context of this thread, what is aimed for is to achieve maximum expansion of this sweet spot. People who use good quality high power amplifiers, high efficiency speakers, active speakers of decent build, some better sorted out pro equipment are often very au fait with considerably enlarged sweet spots; they're well on the way.
So big should this sweet spot be? Well, we want the whole room to be able to characterised as such: remember, we are not changing the sound in any remarkable way, we're simply improving its quality bit by bit, so that the illusion of the invisible driver is not lost anywhere in the room -- no more, and no less than that.
A quick response to those who say that acoustically this is not possible: the argument is along the lines that the phase interference of the sound waves from the left and right speakers create the stereo effect, imaging, etc -- a construct of the brain. And I agree. Totally. But the thing is you do not have to be positioned absolutely precisely equidistant from the two speakers for this to happen. Otherwise, every audio system would have an almost microscopically small sweet spot: the head in a vice syndrome. So those systems that demonstrate an enlarged sweet spot indicate that the ear/brain is tolerant of that phase interference thingy going on, not being "perfect". Quite, quite tolerant, in fact. So what we need to do is exploit that tolerance, for all it's worth ...
...
to be continued ...
(don't worry, this is not going to stagnate, energies are going in another direction just at the moment ...)
Frank
Last edited: