R2R Ladder Implementation - Chip vs Discrete

longinc

Well-Known Member
Nov 26, 2020
43
10
88
I am in the market for a new DAC, and am considering a R2R DAC. And have noticed 2 approaches to such DACs:

1. Using off the shelf R2R ladder chips (e.g TDA 1541, AD1862) but coupled with very expensive power supplies & output stages (using pricey transformers/chokes)
2. Using premium (pricey) discrete resistors to implement the R2R ladder network, and good power supply & output stages (but not to the extent of the former approach in terms of super premium components for the power supply and output stage)

I am sure there is a trade-off made between the 2 approaches to hit certain price points. Is there a preferred approach? In an ideal world, I would have a few of these DACs home for audition/comparison at the same time but logistically that is not feasible at this time. Would appreciate any insight from this highly knowledgeable group.

Thank you!
 
I've seen a pretty close correlation between discrete R2R and good quality power and output stages. I also notice a correlation between R2R chip DACs and tubes/more colored output sections.

What I do know is that the discrete designs can usually resolve to higher bit depths, whereas the chips tend to be limited to 16 bit, or occasionally 20 bit. And there are excellent performing, well-liked DACs of both designs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: longinc
I have an Abbas Psyche R2R DAC. It uses three tubes on the analog board and five tubes on the digital board. It uses a TDA1541A S1 DAC chip
I also owned an Aqua La Scala DAC. It uses discrete resistors to do the digital-to-analog conversion. It uses one tube for the single-ended connection and a second tube for the differential connection.
I owned both of them for awhile so I was able to compare them. I liked the Psyche better but not by much. I can see how someone would like the La Scala better. The Psyche is more open, organic and airy. The La Scala has better nuance and dynamics.
I’m not sure I can say the discrete R2R was better than a chip with R2R but both were excellent. I think the best way to know which DAC is better is to try them in your system but that isn’t always easy.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7329.jpeg
    IMG_7329.jpeg
    676.2 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_7321.jpeg
    IMG_7321.jpeg
    935.9 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_6141.jpeg
    IMG_6141.jpeg
    909.8 KB · Views: 17

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing