Just had a quick read. It is indeed a rather poorly framed piece I agree.
I think there is an underlying but important message that he was trying to communicate namely:
>> There is an increasing interest in hifi ethos of yesteryear due to the tragic pathway that modern hifi has trodden
He is trying to encourage the industry to have a rethink about its current direction of travel by looking into its past with a sharper focus. This instead of rehashing old products that merely have a retro vibe about them.
I've read some pretty preposterous things recently, but this one is right up there, I must congratulate the author for being so far off the mark, he can't even see the target anymore.
Reads like someone who doesn't know a lot. The only thing he's picked up on is some people want a retro look. The only company that might produce an actual vintage sound is maybe Fyne, but that is to be proven.
Frankly on the electronics side they wouldn't even know how to achieve the classic sound if they wanted to.
Also I think he is confused about the physics of our known universe. Small speaker drivers have limitations and disadvantages that come with their advantages. There's no free lunch, everything has compromise (even if it's mostly sheer size). But to that effect one would also have to recognize that innovation tends to be very limited because of very simple physics that we cannot change.
“Is it simply nostalgia that keeps these things alive? Or, as I am starting to believe, the fact that the path that mainstream hi-fi has taken, where ultimate performance is sacrificed at the altar of convenience and lifestyle, has left a small but significant minority feeling short-changed? Are these people reverting back to the kinds of products that got them interested in hi-fi in the first place? It certainly looks that way – and that’s not necessarily a bad thing.
It does, however, have us questioning where the future path of hi-fi is heading. What I’d like to see hi-fi manufacturers do is to take a long look at the products they make and consider whether they are fit for purpose. A bursting features list and the kind of styling that would find its way into a Wallpaper magazine photoshoot is good, but does the product really connect the listener to the music? If it doesn’t, that product serves no real purpose. After all, the reason people spend money, time and effort on hi-fi is so they can listen to music they love in the best way they can access.”
It strikes me that the primary purpose of this article is not to offer some revelation about the state of the audio industry, or to observe some reactionary trend by old coots seeking to reclaim their past, or to warn us that by rejecting modern advances we are actually entering some unknown territory. No, the primary purpose of this article is to be read.
I don't know which came first, the title or the contents, but I'm guessing it was the title. It is such an enticing hook, isn't it -- almost defining tabloid audio. "The dirty truth ... ." After that title it must have been relatively simple to assert that valve amplifiers, wooden cabinets, and record players are evidence of a fawning nostalgia or an aged reaction to transistors, svelte polymer cabinets or streaming bits from a satellite, all the while implying a dottering irrationality as if the whole audio hobby is collapsing in on itself by a lurch backwards.
Is it simply nostalgia that keeps these things alive? Or, as I am starting to believe, the fact that the path that mainstream hi-fi has taken, where ultimate performance is sacrificed at the altar of convenience and lifestyle, has left a small but significant minority feeling short-changed?
There is no logic in those words. Lifestyle and convenience are the provence of modernity. Why do they have a necessarily deleterious impact on performance? Ultimately the article poses no answers and offers no insight.
Why? Because it was written to be read. To occupy and draw attention from enough eyeballs in hopes of boosting page hits for its publisher sufficient to attract and hold advertisers. Looks like it might be working.
Do you really care what his view is? I don't! Nothing he said is going to move me from enjoying tube amps, or CDs for that matter. And, if there was more available music on vinyl for the genre I mostly enjoy I'd reinsert my Clearaudio TT into one of my 2 systems
Just my 2 cents but I don't think that everything in audio needs to be subjected to a philosophical debate, especially when it comes to formats. To me, whatever format gives you the musical experience that you enjoy is what's best for you. For instance , folks like streaming for breath of available artists/titles, discovery of new music, convenience, etc. I don't have an interest in streaming, but I don't tell folks that they shouldn't go that path. Likewise, I don't worry if folks think that I am living in the past listening via CDs, it is my choice and as long as I enjoy my listening experience that is all that matters to me. The author is entitled to his opinion, but come the end of the day that is all it is his opinion and his preferences. More power to him if he is in the class D amplification and streaming mode and that suits him best . I'll continue to enjoy the amplification type and format mode that I employ. No great debate necessary IMHO
Article reminds me of the recent drivel about architects building with “listening rooms” in mind, when the article was really about interior designers repurposing some existing room with little attention to actual acoustics.
A puff piece — the author probably given a topic, word count, and deadline.
The German Importer of Mission, Wharfedale, Quad, Line Magnetics, Castle, Luxman and others is named : IAD
The author should have taken the time to get this right.
He should know a little bit about fashion (late 70‘th and 80‘th are back, „Stranger Things“ Netflix 4th season parties in 80‘th style are happening in all bigger cities) and furniture trends (shabby style) is dominating the hipster quarters of cities.
In some markets „Retro“ has developed into „Newtro“ , a new style, which uses elements of well known Designs and blends them with newest technology. I would call the new small full active online Mini Horn speakers from JBL as „Newtro“
The OMA brand as such in „Newtro“
(at least for me)
so there are a lot more angles to look into the new „old style“ products, which are launched during Munich 2022
.It is not so much nostalgia, but rather companies, (sic) holding companies who buy up venerable brand names, proceeding to re-introduce brands/models which resemble the historic gear mainly in their outward appearance. For example, let's take IAG with their re-introduction of Wharfeddale Lintons, Dentons, and Dovedales in name only. These speakers diverge from their original design, with which I take no exception, just give them their OWN names.
And then there's the line of Mission Speakers, another venerable British brand acquired by IAG. Who's to say how true they are to their original design. I know for one thing that the new Linton Stands and Mission 770 Stands have more in common than anything else. Look at them closely. Mission Speaker stands never looked like those, and for transparency's sake, I have owned original Wharfedale Dentons and Lintons as well as Mission 700s (white baffle) and I currently own a pair of Mission 727s (white baffle). I also personally know individuals who were with a number of brands IAG has acquired over the years and they are none too happy with how things have evolved. While LEAK is not mentioned in the piece, the look of the new models would make blind people shiver.
Bottom line, this has NOTHING to do with being infatuated with nostalgia, but rather the lack of creativity, and desire to cash in on a reputable brand and model name rather than the hard, honest work of designing, developing, and marketing a fresh new product, whose heritage lies in its present/future and definitely NOT a rear-view mirror.
Given the high level of sound quality ARC is achieving these days, I find it curious that Ketan doesn’t recognize the real advances in tube amplifier design and sound.
I don't understand why vacuum tubes are considered retro or out-dated, when resistors, capacitors or transformers are not. Afterall, these other electronic components have been around for even longer, and all hi fi components use them. Transistors are not direct replacements for vacuum tubes, since they have different electrical characteristics, any more than batteries are replacements for capacitors. That's why tubes are used in many industrial applications. If you need to achieve a certain result that only tubes can give, you use tubes. Simple as that. As for loudspeaker designs, many "modern" designs are more for lifestyle reasons (smaller footprints, better fit with modern furniture etc.) and have nothing to do with advances in acoustical sciences.
That’s why, although I am impressed with the SOTA from the distant past, I really think taking those principles and applying them with a modern lens can yield stunning results. Speakers can be debated heavily ( I like modern horns but I know some here who will swear only old ones are any good) but for my preferred amp technology, SET, I would take a modern version over a refurbished 1930s amp every time. A grave mistake many audio engineers make is thinking everything old is obsolete…like the computer industry. In audio, some of the old ideas to get realistic sound are still the best but accumulated knowledge and technology in other areas can be harnessed to yield a better version of that idea. I find the shameless visual design ripoff of the past silly and amusing (look at Fyne make Tannoy Heritage knockoffs now….their own designs were way cooler looking). Silbatone is one great company marrying new with old…would love to try one of their amps at home one day…
www.whathifi.com
