I've lost my will to live.
If you don't think it makes a difference then you don't have any experience.
Not having any experience has never been a disqualifier for having an opinion on this forum.
Plonk thinks that it's part of his comedy act - he butts in on a lot of threads in this way - it's par for the course, I'm afraid!I suppose that is true. It's unfortunate to see Punk make snide comments after I expressed an honest and heartfelt opinion.
............
Actually, I will concede that there are design considerations in usb cables that could mitigate audio problems that could occur in the transfer of data from point A to point B and might even be audible. All of them, except for the elimination of the power-carrying wire, can be and are implemented in many quality cables that sell for <$50. Where's the other $150? Gone.
...........
Tim
Now when you say you "concede" ..... "could"......."could"....."might"...... you sound more like a politician than a comedian - plausible deniability at every step!!
Ok Tim,
Let's keep on the thread topic & the interesting stuff - your interjection was a distraction & you can see how it increases the noise Vs the signal level, I hope?
Sorry. That comment was much more polite than what you'd get if I expressed my actual feelings about spending $200 on a usb cable. I actually own an "audiophile" usb cable. Got it when I was in the business, at just a hair over cost, which is a small fraction of retail (the mark-up on premium cables is mind-boggling). And I've "heard" several others. So I have some experience. I just didn't think it worth mentioning, because they way these things always go is that your opinion is not valid unless you have experience, and if you have experience, then your opinion is not valid unless you have "heard" the specific cable in question, and if you have, then your opinion is not valid....the list gets rather long.
Actually, I will concede that there are design considerations in usb cables that could mitigate audio problems that could occur in the transfer of data from point A to point B and might even be audible. All of them, except for the elimination of the power-carrying wire, can be and are implemented in many quality cables that sell for <$50. Where's the other $150? Gone.
And all of these problems that are being solved by these premium cables? At the margins that are being made, if they were substantive, their audible affect on the system output would be measured, published and marketed, and the manufacture of premium digital cables would be a big business selling to businesses with critical applications -- R&D, recording, etc. Instead, they are all small (though I'm sure very profitable) boutique companies selling to a niche hobby market well-known for it's excessive spending habits and denial of pretty basic science and engineering.
There's your long answer.
Tim
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |