If that's directed to me, then Mephisto - I part exchanged the Essence for the Mephisto. The Commander isn't an imminent upgrade though, just being planned.
New Diablo 333
- Thread starter Hasse
- Start date
I imagine that you're absolutely right wrt to your comments regarding upgrade of the Pandora to Commander vs Mephisto to Apex. I've no plans to change to Apex. I'll certainly post some comments when I change to Commander, but as mentioned above - it's not an imminent upgrade. I actually want to change my speakers first, then the pre as I've heard that the Commander is a big step forward from the Pandora (which I think sounds pretty amazing to me).
I don't think I've ever been anywhere near 46 on my Pandora - usually 28-35 depending on input, so your point about full bias is really interesting. I'm going to have to admit to being 'one of those people' and leaving the amp in high. That said, I'm off to go and find my green bias cable as I've never used it. Thanks for the tip.
Redwick, have you got either of the modules installed in the 333? I had the PS2 phono in my 300 and then transplanted it into my Essence pre. The newer phono is supposed to be quite good isn't it? I see that it has xlr connectors, and also the dip switches are external - a great idea.
I'm typically 30-40 on the volume. Large room. All though as I peck Sonny Stitt And Company is at 43. If you listen 28-35 medium Bias is giving you all the Class A that is demanded. Seldom do I go into High Bias. You will see exactly what I am referencing when you hook up the Green Bias cable...As you, the Commander is on the wish list...BTW I also think the Pandora sounds amazing with the Mephisto...
They are, as well as the Commander. I should have specified the Pandora was made to pair with the Mephisto...
Yes that is probably so. I remember a comment from the owner of Suncoast Audio, who said that when comparing the Pre and power Essence combo with the Pre Essence + Mephisto, perhaps he preferred the first (except for the bass control), now when you added the Pandora to the Mephisto, it became the comparison ended.
When I now think back, after buying the Mephisto. I demoed some different preamplifiers thinking the Pandora is old and has been around for a long time. Everything sounded good with the Mephisto, but I felt like something was missing. When I spoke with Rune he was adamant about me pairing the Pandora with the Mephisto. He was very specific without any waffling saying the Pandora is meant for the Mephisto. Happy I listened to his input...Someday Would love to upgrade to Apex/Commander...Crazy obsession...
I am happy to now report that after further extensive listening I have decided to keep the 333 and part-ex the 300. The 333 is an astonishing amplifier but it needs to be warmed up and it needs some break in. At least 50 hours. And I think it will get better once it has done more than 100. The manual says that 45 minutes are necessary after switch on too before the amp is ready for serious listening.
The 333 is on another level when compared to the 300. The dynamics and bass are something else. Tracks that I knew sounded completely different through the 333. The soundstage is wider, higher and deeper. With the 300 you are sitting in the stalls. With the 333 you are standing next to the conductor. The 333 is a huge step up in transparency compared to the 300 too. The 300 was a great amplifier but anyone thinking about upgrading must listen to the 333 (funds permitting). I also conducted my audition with the as supplied cheap mains lead as I haven't converted my custom one and fitted a 20 amp IEC. Operationally it's better than the 300 but it's an extra 12kg. As I've mentioned before I dislike the spiked feet so my dealer is investigating alternatives as they could be swapped out. It doesn't get that hot either. The fan is mentioned but you can only hear it spinning when the amp is switched on. Otherwise silence. The remote control is also much better than the 300.
I have not tested the DAC or phono stage.
I would recommend a separate mains spur and I'd avoid using any type of power conditioner.
The 333 is on another level when compared to the 300. The dynamics and bass are something else. Tracks that I knew sounded completely different through the 333. The soundstage is wider, higher and deeper. With the 300 you are sitting in the stalls. With the 333 you are standing next to the conductor. The 333 is a huge step up in transparency compared to the 300 too. The 300 was a great amplifier but anyone thinking about upgrading must listen to the 333 (funds permitting). I also conducted my audition with the as supplied cheap mains lead as I haven't converted my custom one and fitted a 20 amp IEC. Operationally it's better than the 300 but it's an extra 12kg. As I've mentioned before I dislike the spiked feet so my dealer is investigating alternatives as they could be swapped out. It doesn't get that hot either. The fan is mentioned but you can only hear it spinning when the amp is switched on. Otherwise silence. The remote control is also much better than the 300.
I have not tested the DAC or phono stage.
I would recommend a separate mains spur and I'd avoid using any type of power conditioner.
Last edited:
I thought the 333 would not need a fan unless the DAC and phono module are installed?
Do you still find the D300’s midrange warmer than the 333?
The fan can be clearly heard when you first switch on but that may only be part of it’s boot procedure.
I think it does have most of the warmth of the 300 but it has clearly been voiced differently. Again with time it may approach the 300 but it has so much else to offer. I would describe it as more tonally accurate. An eight year old 300 is almost like a revved up valve amp but 333, in my system, can do things that the 300 can't.
I think it does have most of the warmth of the 300 but it has clearly been voiced differently. Again with time it may approach the 300 but it has so much else to offer. I would describe it as more tonally accurate. An eight year old 300 is almost like a revved up valve amp but 333, in my system, can do things that the 300 can't.
Last edited:
Forgot to mention one other thing. Before purchasing the 333 I had a Mola Mola Tambaqui DAC for a week. The DAC is nice but a little dry and "digital" for my taste. But the jump from 300 to 333 is massive compared to the 300 with the the Tambaqui. No comparison. I'm really glad I didn't go for the DAC upgrade.
Really happy to read that you hung in there for a while and are having a great experience with the 333. I enjoyed a 300 for six years, but eventually decided that I needed something more refined in the upper registers. The 333 had not been announced when I decided to go in a different direction with separates. Had the 333 been available, I might have made a different choice. Gryphon is a fine company.
I lived with the Diablo 300 for 7 years when I got an opportunity to evaluate the 333 with my Sonus Faber Amati Futuras.
And the new devil was a different beast.
The 300 is richer, darker and some what grainy when you push it.
The 333 has more air, wider presentation and much faster dynamics.
As a result I have toed out my speakers about an inch on each side with out loosing the mid focus.
If you decide to evaluate the 333 be aware that it does change character over the burn in-period. (at least mine did).
Initially it sounds great, then after 50-100 hours it becomes somewhat lean, and then after 300 hours its is back with added refinement.
While I was waiting for the DAC module I had a Moon 680D as a loaner.
As the Moon cost 50 % more than the module, I was a bit worried that I would be disappointed.
But that was not the case.
The Moon is nice, polite and very likable. I find the DAC module to have way more energy, slam and presence.
And the new devil was a different beast.
The 300 is richer, darker and some what grainy when you push it.
The 333 has more air, wider presentation and much faster dynamics.
As a result I have toed out my speakers about an inch on each side with out loosing the mid focus.
If you decide to evaluate the 333 be aware that it does change character over the burn in-period. (at least mine did).
Initially it sounds great, then after 50-100 hours it becomes somewhat lean, and then after 300 hours its is back with added refinement.
While I was waiting for the DAC module I had a Moon 680D as a loaner.
As the Moon cost 50 % more than the module, I was a bit worried that I would be disappointed.
But that was not the case.
The Moon is nice, polite and very likable. I find the DAC module to have way more energy, slam and presence.
Hello.
Can you confirm a couple of things?
1/ Does mute work properly? With my amp pressing the mute button sets the correct picture on the display (a cross). But the sound is NOT muted. Annoyingly this is intermittent.
2/ After sitting in standby occasionally the amp freezes and refuses to power up. I need to use the main switch to power off and on again. Then everything is normal.
I have reported this to the dealer who has passed it onto Gryphon so that they can provide some firmware fixes.
Would be interesting to know if you have experienced the same issues.
Otherwise I can concur with your findings. My 333 just continues to improve and I have upgraded the DAC to a T+A DAC200 which moves the sound to another level.
Similar threads
