Please let us know your thoughts. This is on my radar....
And how did you like the previous version?I have only had the previous version Lab12 DAC1, curious about the upgraded Reference version as well
It's a really great DAC for the analog lover and for people who only listen to Jazz and acoustic music. For modern, more produced music, it lacks speed, transparency, detail, and dynamics to be satisfying. Very pleasant listen, but you'd be missing a lot of info. I replaced it with a Denafrips Terminator, which in hind-sight was not even that detailed compared to what I've owned after, but was hugely more detailed than the Lab 12 without being fatiguing or having glare.And how did you like the previous version?
Nice thanks for the input.It's a really great DAC for the analog lover and for people who only listen to Jazz and acoustic music. For modern, more produced music, it lacks speed, transparency, detail, and dynamics to be satisfying. Very pleasant listen, but you'd be missing a lot of info. I replaced it with a Denafrips Terminator, which in hind-sight was not even that detailed compared to what I've owned after, but was hugely more detailed than the Lab 12 without being fatiguing or having glare.
For anyone into that kind of analog sound, I would recommend the Mojo Audio Mystique Evo above the Lab 12 DAC1. Again I haven't heard the Reference version, so maybe they've made revolutionary gains.
Please do post your review after you get some time with the Lab12 DAC.Old thread but for anyone interested I’m testing one now. I’ll get 100hrs on it before listening properly. I love the looks. But sound is everything.
Will do.Please do post your review after you get some time with the Lab12 DAC.
Hi sirWill do.
Thanks a ton for taking the time to pen such a detailed reply sir. Much appreciatedApologies for not writing the review of the Lab12 Ref' that I promised. TBH I couldn't find the motivation. It was 'ok'; perhaps a little more than ok bearing in mind its pricepoint. But, in my set-up and room the music didn't move me. Transients were slow, detail didn't impress and I experienced a higher frequency range troubled by metallic leading edges - digititus, if you will. I detected none of the attributes one might associate with tubes in the traditional sense i.e. presentation with a whiff of warmth etc.
It's funny you should be considering Le Dac 2 - because that is where I spent my money in the end. It's just in an entirely different league - as it should be given the cost difference. The attributes you describe as wanting in a DAC are precisely what the Metronome is all about. It's presentation is not as forward as some - a T+A 200 I had on direct comparison was very strong in this area - but musicians are certainly present enough and, unlike a very forward presentation, I can listen, happily, for hours. But that's not to say it's laid back to the point of 'sleepy'. It tends toward a slightly 'romantic' presentation. Absent are hard edges, and the kind of short, fast decays associated with the in-your-face, relentlessness which initially sounds amazing but soon wears thin. It's wonderful with, particularly, solo vocals and classical, but it rocks and clubs, too. Piano is a great test of any dac/system - Le Dac 2 does it true and authentic. Ultimately, it revealed a deep level of emotion in the music to which it connected me - and you can't ask for more than that.
What's become a big deal is the Metronome's i2s input. I've always struggled with USB's frequently negative impact on smoothness. I bought a used Marix S/pdif, powered by S Booster (goes between Melco server and Le Dac) so I could test the i2s input and it's unquestionably another step up. The USB input on the Le Dac is by no means deficient, but I did find sound to relax and smoothen further via i2s. The Matrix clock/FPGA processing may be playing a part in this, too. Detail seems to rise a little across all frequencies and I can see 'into' the music further. I won't go back to direct USB. Metronome have just launched a streamer and, though I don't need one per se, I will try it in place of the Matrix to see if its i2s output produces a result even better than that of the Matrix.
I absolutely recommend you demo' the Metronome. I reviewed it here: https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/metronome-le-dac-2-review.37030/#post-888412
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |