Given the experience along my audio journey, I can agree.It is just that the ear is better than £5,000 or even £10,000 test gear.
Given the experience along my audio journey, I can agree.It is just that the ear is better than £5,000 or even £10,000 test gear.
(...) The problem for most 'philes is lack of access to the equipment to take measurements and lack of knowledge and experience to interpret the measurements. At least IME. (...)
While RelCaps are not "sexy" and the flavor of the day like Duelund, Mundorf, etc. they are consistently reliable and produce among the best capacitors available. They can design and make polystyrene caps in any number and value you like.It is not true that you cannot find polystyrene caps for typical coupling applications. If you are a manufacturer, just call Bas Lim and tell him Gary sent you. For DIY, you may be able to find some of Rel's Multicap series at Parts Connexion. They are not cheap, but they have some of the lowest distortion measurements of any coupling capacitor.
Also, +1 to andy_c's comment on C0G ceramic caps.
(...) We took ceramic, electrolytic, mica, polystyrene (not sure those are available now), polypropelyne, and teflon capacitors of equal values and used them in the coupling circuit of a Hafler preamp (because it was a kit build of mine so easy to fiddle with). We compared THD, IMD, and noise plus did pulse testing to look for hysteresis as well as the usual VNA measurements, then conducted listening tests. I am not sure anything we did was new or the results any different than any other experiment, but it was fun at the time.
We played a little with speaker caps but it was hard to get repeatable results in DBTs.
Micro
Let's not go there... it is clear that the type of capacitors has an impact on the sound and the impact can be measured .. Heck! it is measured in the papers you presented.,, It is as if as if the design of an electrical circuit is magic .. Come on! man! If the Dueland sound and repeatably, there has to be a change of measurable characteristics...
As for topology, It is a truism , Different capacitors have different place in circuitry .. that has been known for a long time. But, given a topology there could be differences between capacitors of the same material and some capacitors may present better results in a given application than others .. Call it be whatever name you will .. Component "Sound" is as good an expression as another...
As far as I know, other than a few studies showing that some capacitors (such as tantalum, electrolytic or ceramic capacitors) introduce measurable distortion, you will find no objective and independent studies on the effects of capacitor types in sound quality - illusions (in the audiophile sense of the word) are not simple to prove by scientific methods.
My personal view - there is not such thing as the sound of a component, but there is the sound of component in a defined position of a defined circuit. In other words, there is so single magic, only group magic.
Dunno, show me some measurements. However, IME nobody can defeat a mind already made up. My experience with measurements and audiophiles has been very interesting. Most of the time the 'philes were annoyed when they could hear things we couldn't measure, especially when they could not pass any sort of blind listening test. However, there were those cases when repeatability happened and we had to figure out what and how to measure to explain what was clearly heard. Again IME to dismiss measurements or hearing out of hand is a mistake, but I am a skeptic.
In the past I was able to correlate fairly gross (to my standards) measured characteristics of a few different types of capacitors to listening tests. This was in the 1980's. We took ceramic, electrolytic, mica, polystyrene (not sure those are available now), polypropelyne, and teflon capacitors of equal values and used them in the coupling circuit of a Hafler preamp (because it was a kit build of mine so easy to fiddle with). We compared THD, IMD, and noise plus did pulse testing to look for hysteresis as well as the usual VNA measurements, then conducted listening tests. I am not sure anything we did was new or the results any different than any other experiment, but it was fun at the time.
We played a little with speaker caps but it was hard to get repeatable results in DBTs.
What I really wanted to ask is does REL still make polystyrenes? As I understood it, there were some new rules and regs about PS and PS caps were a thing of the past. That's why some like cj moved onto the Teflons while others are using polypropylene, etc.
Interesting. I can imagine you could easily separate the ceramic, electrolytic and mica using measurements, but was there any measurable difference in the audio band between the polystyrene, polypropelyne and teflon capacitors?