So here is a thread put up in Blizzards Corner by a member who offered a $10K system that would sound good all day. Not only was his opinion stifled but the thread was usurped and taken completely off topic that I notice the OP has removed the OP. Surely there is something wrong here Mike. There were but a few posts discussing Marty's system but you took it completely off topic. I don't think I the only one who feels this way. Surely a member who starts a thread has some ownership
Yes what's wrong is I offered suggestions on how the system could be improved upon for less cost, and Marty was offended by it and took it personally. But it was nothing personal, just my feedback based on my experience with audio gear. This is "What's best forum" and if there's suggestions I can make that could improve preformance for less cost I don't think that's anything to be ashamed of.
I think you're truly missing my point Mike.
What's that?
There's an amplifier there, being tested out with everything you can think of that might make a difference. Including needing temporary check for RF shielding to determine the impedance behavior in relation to the different parts while in a high RF environment. I like that it looks a little crazy, it means I've been busy. Maybe some day I'll design out a bunch of custom boxes with adjustable legs and such to serve the purpose... but it's not often I need to do that, and I seem to have plenty of spare hunk of aluminum and odd cookware I've been gifted.
You shut him down in a unseemly manor Mike , there is truth and honesty and there is being a arse. Normally I don't mind but he seemed fun, and knows his onions. Extending respect to everyone is maybe a bridge too far for you lol but some guys deserve it.
I have been talking to Marty about the streamer and amp on other threads already. He already knows my viewpoint towards that. I already have a $10000 system thread on this subforum. If anything making another thread with almost the same title to compete with it was asking for the feedback that resulted.
How things could have went was "why do you think those components would be better" And I could have responded with a very reasonable explanation based on my experience (which I did) and then he could have said "that makes a lot of sense, thanks for the recommendation". But I guess expecting that kind of exchange is out of line.
Umm, there is a disconnect between what you think your communicating and what is being understood by the other party. Your intention or at least your reasoned defence of your intentions are rational but your blind to the impression your rhetoric has had.
Normally this is most amusing as the guys are kind of deserving imo... But not in this case. I read your exchange before he buggered off and thought " this guys is going to tell you were to go" I was infact surprised he was as polite as he was but he has indeed left, shame.
Not too worry
I've shown a picture of the 1 system a few times already. The other setup is not ready for public disclosure.
View attachment 25730
Windows on the right, speakers stuck in corners... room for improvement until you hear the gear properly IMO.
The problem is you were likely not following that I have been talking to Marty for a couple months now about the NUC based streamer. He was going to set it up at one point. He came here and expressed that the reason he recommended the $2200 Aurender over the NUC based setup was because of the difficulty of setting up my recommendation. As I have explained to him, it's not difficult at all and results in not only superior sound, but a better user interface.
And I have already discussed the amp situation in detail with him already. I've owned and built several of his recommended amp, as well as the NC-500 based amps. So I'm in a pretty good position to judge the differences between them.
You don't start a thread to purposely compete with my other thread, recommending against products he knows I believe in, if you're innocently not looking for any constructive criticism.
I was up to speed with your communications with the guy. Never mind. I told you a while ago, you have to leave space for people to express them selfs. If you don't then your not talking, your not having a dialogue. They will feel aggrieved, yes you committed this sin with a guy who was honestly trying to engage you. You don't see it because you don't understand it. Oh well, I have to say you have never been like that with me, then again we don't have that kind of dialogue. When it comes to tech discussions your tact turns to evangelical preacher mode, it's all absolutes and statements with a big dollop of the dismissive about it. The guys been building amps since the 80s... He gave you respect, but got non back. He even asked for it in desperation but still got non. Bad times
Oh well, on the subject of YashN post about your room. who knows what music sounds like in there but I bet it's good. It's a nice looking room to listen to music in by my reckoning. Can't slag it off unless you been there dude.
Mike what did you plug the ports with? I had success with a bunch of drinking straws lol no really it's good. I use then in my sisters set up.
Hello all and good evening to you. This forum lost a good man with a very fine ear today. I am saddened by him leaving.
Tom
Yea I used socks for my sisters then a hifi geezer recommend trying kids straws.... It's better lol but the speakers are monitors, if your bored one day give them a go ..