Could 'Wolf' mark end of DiCaprio's Oscar drought?

Steve williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
By JESSICA HERNDON | Associated Press

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. (AP) — Leonardo DiCaprio is poking his head out of a poolside room at the Beverly Hilton Hotel.
It's afternoon, and a swarm of media outlets is lined up outside, chatting with Oscar contenders after the Academy Awards' annual luncheon for nominees. Nominated for lead actor for his role as an excess-obsessed stockbroker in "The Wolf of Wall Street," DiCaprio stands to gain plenty of attention if he's viewed, but he goes unseen.
Still, he can't conceal his curiosity. "What's going on out there?" he asks with childlike intrigue, lowering his brow. "Why are there only two people on pool floats?" Turns out, they're models hired to liven up the background of an entertainment show's feed.

"That's corny," DiCaprio says with a laugh. But surely the 39-year-old actor understands the allure of overdoing it.
Decadence is what fueled "Wolf," a film that's gained him two Oscar nominations for acting and producing. DiCaprio has been nominated for three other Academy Awards, starting with a supporting actor bid for playing a teen with autism in the 1993 drama, "What's Eating Gilbert Grape." He's been overlooked each time.
This could be his year. Is he frustrated he hasn't won?

"Here, I'll show you the card they gave me today" (at the luncheon), he says, rummaging through his pockets after setting aside the electronic cigarette he says he puffs to "relieve the stress of life." He retrieves a small white card he calls "that little football chalk-up" listing his film stats. Leaning in, he points to the portion that reads: five nominations, zero wins. With a heavy chuckle he looks up and says, "Zip!"

With the card back in his pocket, DiCaprio adds: "It's quite interesting. People think I feel I'm overdue for something ..." He stares at the ground for a moment, collecting his thoughts. "Anyone wants to be accepted by their peers, but the truth is every year is unique and everyone is just going to vote for who they think is worthy."
Nominated for lead actor Oscars for "The Aviator" and "Blood Diamond," DiCaprio has lost to Jamie Foxx and Forest Whitaker (he lost the best supporting actor statuette to Tommy Lee Jones). This year, he's up against Christian Bale, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Bruce Dern and Matthew McConaughey, who is considered DiCaprio's biggest threat for his portrayal of a rodeo-loving Texan with HIV in "Dallas Buyers Club."

"We haven't seen Leo and McConaughey paired off in any award show," says Tom O'Neil, editor of the awards prediction site goldderby.com. "The assumption is Leo can't do it."

But this wouldn't be because he lacks skill. DiCaprio, whose first big film role was opposite Robert De Niro in 1993's "This Boy's Life," has starred in a number of films that gained Oscar attention, including two best picture winners: "Titanic" and "The Departed." ''Gangs of New York," ''Catch Me if You Can," ''Revolutionary Road," ''Inception," ''Django Unchained" and last year's "The Great Gatsby" have also earned Academy attention.

"It's as if the old men in the Academy look at someone like Leo and say, 'You have the money, the fame, the babes, but here's one thing you can't have,'" adds O'Neil. "We've seen a history of it. Paul Newman didn't win until he was past the age of 60. Often, if you are old or if you let yourself go to hell like Matthew McConaughey did in 'Dallas Buyers Club' by losing a lot of weight, the Academy awards you."

Many major Hollywood talents have endured Oscar snubs. Neither Alfred Hitchcock nor Stanley Kubrick ever received directing trophies. At the risk of gaining comparisons to the late actor Peter O'Toole, who was nominated eight times without a win, DiCaprio could go home empty-handed again.
"The thing about it is no matter what film he's in, even if you didn't like the movie, you leave the theater and go, 'That guy just never misses,'" says DiCaprio's "Wolf" co-star Jonah Hill, who is nominated for a best supporting actor Oscar. "Watching Leo work on 'Wolf,' I understand how brilliant he is at what he does. He didn't miss a single moment of that character."

He's been particularly dedicated to the Oscar campaign for "Wolf" — DiCaprio even appeared on "Saturday Night Live" with Hill. "Wolf" marks the actor's fifth collaboration with Martin Scorsese. It's a project he takes extreme pride in, largely because he was part of its development.
"The fact that I brought it to Scorsese and put the financing together ... all of these elements add a whole other level of responsibility," he says. That includes defending the racy material in the film, which has gained a bad rep for glorifying greed.

"I've never been a part of a film that had this sincere level of controversy around it," DiCaprio says. "But I want to have films out there that cater to an audience that I think is yearning for something that is a little more outlandish."

His hunch proved spot-on. "Wolf," costing $100 million to make, has earned over $230 million worldwide. "You make these movies, you work as hard as you possibly can, you put your life on hold and you hope for the best," adds the actor.
"I've had the same mentality ever since I got my first movie," he says. "I got my foot in this door and I am going to continue to jam it in there and grind."
 
What you think Stevie? MC is ahead on my imaginary ballot.
 
I am a huge movie fan esp when it comes to the Academy Awards

IMO the Award deservedly should go to Matthew McConaughey in Dallas Buyers Club which BTW was my sleeper movie of the year. If I had a vote, that would be my best picture along with him as Best Actor and hands down Jared Leto for Best Supporting actor

IMO Leo is the dark horse in the race
 
By JESSICA HERNDON | Associated Press

BEVERLY HILLS, Calif. (AP) — Leonardo DiCaprio is poking his head out of a poolside room at the Beverly Hilton Hotel.
It's afternoon, and a swarm of media outlets is lined up outside, chatting with Oscar contenders after the Academy Awards' annual luncheon for nominees. Nominated for lead actor for his role as an excess-obsessed stockbroker in "The Wolf of Wall Street," DiCaprio stands to gain plenty of attention if he's viewed, but he goes unseen.
Still, he can't conceal his curiosity. "What's going on out there?" he asks with childlike intrigue, lowering his brow. "Why are there only two people on pool floats?" Turns out, they're models hired to liven up the background of an entertainment show's feed.

"That's corny," DiCaprio says with a laugh. But surely the 39-year-old actor understands the allure of overdoing it.
Decadence is what fueled "Wolf," a film that's gained him two Oscar nominations for acting and producing. DiCaprio has been nominated for three other Academy Awards, starting with a supporting actor bid for playing a teen with autism in the 1993 drama, "What's Eating Gilbert Grape." He's been overlooked each time.
This could be his year. Is he frustrated he hasn't won?

"Here, I'll show you the card they gave me today" (at the luncheon), he says, rummaging through his pockets after setting aside the electronic cigarette he says he puffs to "relieve the stress of life." He retrieves a small white card he calls "that little football chalk-up" listing his film stats. Leaning in, he points to the portion that reads: five nominations, zero wins. With a heavy chuckle he looks up and says, "Zip!"

With the card back in his pocket, DiCaprio adds: "It's quite interesting. People think I feel I'm overdue for something ..." He stares at the ground for a moment, collecting his thoughts. "Anyone wants to be accepted by their peers, but the truth is every year is unique and everyone is just going to vote for who they think is worthy."
Nominated for lead actor Oscars for "The Aviator" and "Blood Diamond," DiCaprio has lost to Jamie Foxx and Forest Whitaker (he lost the best supporting actor statuette to Tommy Lee Jones). This year, he's up against Christian Bale, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Bruce Dern and Matthew McConaughey, who is considered DiCaprio's biggest threat for his portrayal of a rodeo-loving Texan with HIV in "Dallas Buyers Club."

"We haven't seen Leo and McConaughey paired off in any award show," says Tom O'Neil, editor of the awards prediction site goldderby.com. "The assumption is Leo can't do it."

But this wouldn't be because he lacks skill. DiCaprio, whose first big film role was opposite Robert De Niro in 1993's "This Boy's Life," has starred in a number of films that gained Oscar attention, including two best picture winners: "Titanic" and "The Departed." ''Gangs of New York," ''Catch Me if You Can," ''Revolutionary Road," ''Inception," ''Django Unchained" and last year's "The Great Gatsby" have also earned Academy attention.

"It's as if the old men in the Academy look at someone like Leo and say, 'You have the money, the fame, the babes, but here's one thing you can't have,'" adds O'Neil. "We've seen a history of it. Paul Newman didn't win until he was past the age of 60. Often, if you are old or if you let yourself go to hell like Matthew McConaughey did in 'Dallas Buyers Club' by losing a lot of weight, the Academy awards you."

Many major Hollywood talents have endured Oscar snubs. Neither Alfred Hitchcock nor Stanley Kubrick ever received directing trophies. At the risk of gaining comparisons to the late actor Peter O'Toole, who was nominated eight times without a win, DiCaprio could go home empty-handed again.
"The thing about it is no matter what film he's in, even if you didn't like the movie, you leave the theater and go, 'That guy just never misses,'" says DiCaprio's "Wolf" co-star Jonah Hill, who is nominated for a best supporting actor Oscar. "Watching Leo work on 'Wolf,' I understand how brilliant he is at what he does. He didn't miss a single moment of that character."

He's been particularly dedicated to the Oscar campaign for "Wolf" — DiCaprio even appeared on "Saturday Night Live" with Hill. "Wolf" marks the actor's fifth collaboration with Martin Scorsese. It's a project he takes extreme pride in, largely because he was part of its development.
"The fact that I brought it to Scorsese and put the financing together ... all of these elements add a whole other level of responsibility," he says. That includes defending the racy material in the film, which has gained a bad rep for glorifying greed.

"I've never been a part of a film that had this sincere level of controversy around it," DiCaprio says. "But I want to have films out there that cater to an audience that I think is yearning for something that is a little more outlandish."

His hunch proved spot-on. "Wolf," costing $100 million to make, has earned over $230 million worldwide. "You make these movies, you work as hard as you possibly can, you put your life on hold and you hope for the best," adds the actor.
"I've had the same mentality ever since I got my first movie," he says. "I got my foot in this door and I am going to continue to jam it in there and grind."

Not his best role by a long shot, but his time has come. His buddy Scorcese got it for a movie not nearly his best either.
 
If there is such a thing as sentimental favorite, I want to see Leonardo win this time. I liked him in Django last year.
 
The academy awards is fundamentally flawed. There can be a whole plethora of reasons - timing and politics being the most common - why an actor like DiCaprio, who has been turning out stunning, shape-shifting performances on film since he was a kid, and a guy like McConne...however you spell that...could win on a short string of good performances in serious roles after a couple of decades of the kind of light-hearted stuff that, no matter how good it might be, the Academy refuses to take seriously. The consolation is that if DiCaprio continues to turn out great performances, eventually the Academy will give him a statue. Probably in the wrong year for the wrong picture, but it will be deemed "his turn." And that, my friends, is why I agree that "It's the nomination that counts," maybe even the nominations in the whole awards season that count, and I can't bring myself to take the Academy seriously.

Tim
 
The academy awards is fundamentally flawed. There can be a whole plethora of reasons - timing and politics being the most common - why an actor like DiCaprio, who has been turning out stunning, shape-shifting performances on film since he was a kid, and a guy like McConne...however you spell that...could win on a short string of good performances in serious roles after a couple of decades of the kind of light-hearted stuff that, no matter how good it might be, the Academy refuses to take seriously. The consolation is that if DiCaprio continues to turn out great performances, eventually the Academy will give him a statue. Probably in the wrong year for the wrong picture, but it will be deemed "his turn." And that, my friends, is why I agree that "It's the nomination that counts," maybe even the nominations in the whole awards season that count, and I can't bring myself to take the Academy seriously.

Tim

not sure that I completely agree. An Oscar is given each year for the Best actor . Only is a special tribute given for an actor after many years such as Peter O'Toole recently

Personally I liked Leo in Wolf Of Wall Street. I just happen to like Matthew McConaughey this year in Dallas Buyer's Club better and that's why I would give him the Oscar as well as Jared Leto for Best Supporting. If I had a vote it would be for DBC as Best Picture
 
not sure that I completely agree. An Oscar is given each year for the Best actor . Only is a special tribute given for an actor after many years such as Peter O'Toole recently

Personally I liked Leo in Wolf Of Wall Street. I just happen to like Matthew McConaughey this year in Dallas Buyer's Club better and that's why I would give him the Oscar as well as Jared Leto for Best Supporting. If I had a vote it would be for DBC as Best Picture

I'm not saying MM doesn't deserve it. I just watched that movie this morning, and he turned in a fine performance. But regardless, the "this year" nature of the awards often makes timing a more important factor than the performance itself. Let's say, for example, McConaughey wins and deserves to. And let's say, for the sake of argument, that Leo finds himself up against unexpected great performances like McConaughey's every year, and never gets an Oscar until they finally give him one for a performance that is pedestrian compared to his best, just because it's "his turn," or worse, gives him a lifetime achievement award....because he is one of the top 5 actors of his generation who just never happened to be in the right film at the right time.

That's the way it works. I don't know how I'd fix it, but it sure looks flawed to me.

Tim
 
That's the way it works Tim

Being in the right place at the right time

FWIW Meryl Streep is the most nominated actor with 17 to her credit. Look how many she has won

Remember Hilary Swank in 1999 when she won for Cowboys Don't Cry beating Annette Bening (American Beauty), Meryl Streep (Music of the Heart), Julianne Moore (The End of the Affair), Janet McTeer (Tumbleweeds). Have you ever heard from her since

Or how about 2004: Jamie Foxx (Ray) — beat Clint Eastwood (Million Dollar Baby), Leonardo DiCaprio (The Aviator), Johnny Depp (Finding Neverland), Don Cheadle (Hotel Rwanda)
Foxx isn't even a good actor but was the Best that year

Or how about
1998: Roberto Benigni (Life is Beautiful) — beat Tom Hanks (Saving Private Ryan), Edward Norton (American History X), Nick Nolte (Affliction), Ian McKellen (Gods and Monsters)
Great role but look who he beat

Or how about 1995: Nicolas Cage (Leaving Las Vegas) — beat Sean Penn (Dead Man Walking), Anthony Hopkins (Nixon), Richard Dreyfuss (Mr. Holland's Opus), Massimo Troisi (The Postman)
IMO Cage deservedly won that Oscar. Look where he is now

It's all about timing Tim

IMO Leo is a dark horse but for me the better actor this year was Matthew McConaughey
 
Sort of reminds me of Alfred Hitchcock, never won best director/best film....
Technically there are some awards won at the Academy Awards for a couple of his films but they were never for him specifically (such as George Barnes Cinematography for Rebecca).
He really missed out on a lot of awards for some brilliant films and not just from AA :(
PS, do not trust wiki it is a bit iffy on this; need to use IMDB and other sources.
Cheers
Orb
 
The academy awards is fundamentally flawed. There can be a whole plethora of reasons - timing and politics being the most common - why an actor like DiCaprio, who has been turning out stunning, shape-shifting performances on film since he was a kid, and a guy like McConne...however you spell that...could win on a short string of good performances in serious roles after a couple of decades of the kind of light-hearted stuff that, no matter how good it might be, the Academy refuses to take seriously. The consolation is that if DiCaprio continues to turn out great performances, eventually the Academy will give him a statue. Probably in the wrong year for the wrong picture, but it will be deemed "his turn." And that, my friends, is why I agree that "It's the nomination that counts," maybe even the nominations in the whole awards season that count, and I can't bring myself to take the Academy seriously.

Tim

Basically agree with that and I feel the same way about the timing and politics. Though I do not fault the members of the Academy. I'm assuming that they vote individually and not like a court jury. But it feels strange for some actor or director who never won to be given a lifetime achievement award in his old years. Just my feeling.
 
Blood Diamond is my fav Leo movie... And i preferred it to the Departed that year

PP- Scorsese was the Leo of directing for two decades
 
Blood Diamond is my fav Leo movie... And i preferred it to the Departed that year

PP- Scorsese was the Leo of directing for two decades

+1 on both counts. Leo was awesome in Blood Diamond, and for MS to have been denied for so long was a crime almost.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu