I didn’t know that. Thanks.no wonder, the Kiseki SUT was designed by Kondo-San
I didn’t know that. Thanks.no wonder, the Kiseki SUT was designed by Kondo-San
Absolutely true transformers produced by Kondo San and assembled in Holland by that farfalla Herman Van Den Dungen. However, this Kiseki mct 2 was a great experience, in the past I had had the mct 1 in my hands and due to the compulsive attitude I had towards hifi and the mania of looking for something better before purchasing a product someone else more far-sighted than me didn't think twice about buying it and taking it home.no wonder, the Kiseki SUT was designed by Kondo-San
Thanks for the info on your experience. Did you change the load also when going from 1:5 or 1:10? Often the difference in sound is because the load the cartridge sees changes.Just for your reference, I have tested a Lundahl transformer, which could be wired for either 1:5 or 1:10, with my EMT P6.0. In my system, I preferred the 1:10 setting. You may want to test the 1:8 setting to see if it works for you!
Best
I would think then, that the difference you heard was due to the change in load the cartridge ‘’see’’ when switching from 1:5 and 1:10. It also makes sense, that when not using load resistors, that you preferred 1:10, as this is closer to the 200 - 300 ohm load recommended by EMT. Here the calculations:No, I didn’t change the loading.
I understand the impedance matching could change the sound, but is halving the impedance a sure advantage? I am not good at this, so what impedance is the cartridge seeing when you connect the secondary in parallel?
Now cartridge is loaded at 270ohms if I’m not mistaken. By paralleling secondaries you achieved low voltage gain (1:4) and double the current at the output of SUT which is unimportant for an MM phono stage.In my case with the 1:4 the cartridge ‘’see’’ around 2900 ohm, and for now I have 330 ohm load resistors on the secondary side of the transformers.
By my calculation the cartride is loaded at 296 ohm. When I have some more hours on the cartridge and SUT I will experiment with the loads.Now cartridge is loaded at 270ohms if I’m not mistaken. By paralleling secondaries you achieved low voltage gain (1:4) and double the current at the output of SUT which is unimportant for an MM phono stage.
Yes, EMT pickups 1.05mV were always difficult to combine with transformers with a normal gear ratio e.g 1:10. Old STX 20/21s are excellent with Haufe transformers photo .I would think then, that the difference you heard was due to the change in load the cartridge ‘’see’’ when switching from 1:5 and 1:10. It also makes sense, that when not using load resistors, that you preferred 1:10, as this is closer to the 200 - 300 ohm load recommended by EMT. Here the calculations:
1:5 gives: 47000 / (5x5) = 1.880 ohm the cartridge ‘’see’’ as load.
1:10 gives: 47000 / (10x10) = 470 ohm the cartridge ’’see’’ as load.
In my case with the 1:4 the cartridge ‘’see’’ around 2900 ohm, and for now I have 330 ohm load resistors on the secondary side of the transformers.
What I talk about with the benefit of parallel coupling of the secondary windings inside the transformers is something different. This has to do with reducing the so called ‘’copper loss’’ to half as much, and that is a good thing.
both numbers are very close.By my calculation the cartride is loaded at 296 ohm
The stx 21 you can buy at Studiotechnik Dusch,thats the orginal transformer from emt tube phono 155 for all 24 ohm coil cartridges from emt in a better housing.@DasguteOhr, thank you for sharing the STX 20 / 21, I have never seen that before. As you say the 1.05mV is a bit problematic to combine with transformers.
I also noticed, that EMT under Micha Huber now offer more ‘’normal’’ versions of the cartridges. Were I to order a new EMT cartridge, I would go for the 1/4 coil version 2×6ohms 0,3mV version you mention.
New at Dusch ebay shop , used sometimes cheaper on ebay.Thanks again, I have learned something new today! They do not mention the transformer ratio, but one must assume it’s around 1:5..? Do you have any idea on the price level for these?
I tried stx 20 I wasn't crazy about how well it drove the EMT was less transparent than other step ups I've tried already the internal one of my allnic 7000 was much better. To date the one we liked the most is the Kiseki mct 2 but it is unobtainable. the EMT 6 platinum is very sensitive to adjustments such as VTA and everything else. before deciding which step up to use it with, let it work for at least 50 hours. I drive it fantastically with the ypsilon 10 L by putting a 480 Ohms resistor in parallel making it read around 260 ohms. another step up that drives it to great effect is the good tx 103. enjoy listeningThanks again, not to crazy priced. I might try one of those at some point..!
By coincidence, I have Ypsilon MC-10L for sale on AudiomartI tried stx 20 I wasn't crazy about how well it drove the EMT was less transparent than other step ups I've tried already the internal one of my allnic 7000 was much better. To date the one we liked the most is the Kiseki mct 2 but it is unobtainable. the EMT 6 platinum is very sensitive to adjustments such as VTA and everything else. before deciding which step up to use it with, let it work for at least 50 hours. I drive it fantastically with the ypsilon 10 L by putting a 480 Ohms resistor in parallel making it read around 260 ohms. another step up that drives it to great effect is the good tx 103. enjoy listening