Microphone Set-up for Audio System Recordings

What about this?


02112BCA-A98B-4F2C-AE0F-25A226E54CB2.jpeg
 
I am concerned that a single stereo mic won't have the separation analogous to the space between our ears.
 
What about this?

200751F1-B419-428C-835A-D075CBCE304D.jpeg
 
Or binaural on a "head"?
 

Attachments

  • 70BE7E24-702F-489F-868F-FAA8AF532662.jpeg
    70BE7E24-702F-489F-868F-FAA8AF532662.jpeg
    87.8 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Get a Royer SF-24 or 24V stereo ribbon microphone. Probably the best classical recording I own was made with one.


Thank you, Brad.

But what would you suggest that is not US$4300 and US$5800?

What would you suggest in the under US$1,000 range?
 
Hi Ron:
This is one of many Reviews and how to use the Shure MV 88+ Mic.


Thank you! I watched the video.

But if I insist on a microphone which outputs an analog signal would you have a suggestion?
 
A pair of Neumann KM184s is $1500.
Audiotechnica AT4050st is probably very nice as well.

That is helpful, Brad. Thank you! I have been looking at a pair of KM184s versus a pair of Shure KSM141s.

I was looking at side-firing large diaphragm condenser mics (Shure KSM32, AT C214 and AT C314). But, from what I read, they seem to tend to be used more for vocals, often for a little bit of warmth or midrange punch, whereas the small diaphragm condenser mics appear, in general, to be more linear in frequency response and with slightly faster transient response. So that is why I began looking at KM184 and KSM141.

I have been leaning towards the KSM141 because it can switch between cardioid and omni-directional modes. I just don't know which radiation pattern in my proposed microphone configuration would more closely replicate the radiation hearing pattern of the human ear.

Are you familiar with how those two mics compare by any chance?

Do you think it is valuable to have the omni-directional radiation option on the microphones?

Do you feel a single stereo mic like AT 4050ST is the way to go for this particular purpose, rather than two KM184s or two KSM141?

In the two mic configuration how far apart do you think the microphones should be on a dual mic rail?
 
Shure KSM141

Frequency Response of Cardioid Patttern Versus Omni-directional Patter:

Screen Shot 2020-12-28 at 9.41.08 AM.png
 
Neumann KM184 Frequency Response (Cardioid only):

Screen Shot 2020-12-28 at 9.44.10 AM.png
 
Neumann KM184 Frequency Response (Cardioid only):

View attachment 72976
They both seem to roll off a bit more than I would like in the bass...better for instruments but not , perhaps capturing full range stereos. I have heard but not owned Neumanns and they are very good for capturing string instruments and the like. Have a look at the response for the Audio Technica
 
This microphone research project is making me realize that frequency nonlinearities start way before we get the record we are looking at in our hands!

These are expensive, professional microphones. These microphones have lumpier frequency response charts than some of our loudspeakers!
 
Last edited:
They both seem to roll off a bit more than I would like in the bass...better for instruments but not , perhaps capturing full range stereos. I have heard but not owned Neumanns and they are very good for capturing string instruments and the like. Have a look at the response for the Audio Technica


The equivalent small diaphragm condenser mic from Audio Technica appears to be the 4051.

I think I have dropped the plan for large diaphragm microphones on the ground that small diaphragm microphones appear to be more linear in frequency response and faster in transient response.
 
Audio Technica 4051b Frequency Response:

6150A8DC-9544-44D9-9352-3130A155DD39.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: morricab
Here is the binaural head option:


EB7AC869-4FD0-46DF-9C88-7F0107A4761A.jpeg




But I wonder what is the inherent sound quality and linearity of the microphone capsule elements embedded in each ear versus these professional small diaphragm condenser mics?

And I could always place some puffy absorbent blob between the mono mics on the stereo bar to simulate an absorbent head.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu