I found that using it with preamp instead of direct gave my system more dynamics due to the extra gain of the preamp.But have you tried the Pacific directly into the Hegel Amp and preferred it via the Preamp?
Yes I have just experienced that.I found that using it with preamp instead of direct gave my system more dynamics due to the extra gain of the preamp.
yes indeed, it is incredibly transparent even in very low volume, even low frequenciesI am quite enjoying my Hornings as well...they also work very well at low volume.
Maybe try the Wavac pre amp?I have solemnly promised myself to stop with subsequent upgrades
Have tried Horizon twice but still prefer my Pacific.
High end preamp would be a very expensive venture.
For whatever reason there is a huge synergy (input impedance?) between Pacific and Wavac MD805s.
Many thanks for your recommendation. Indeed, I probably need to try Wavac PR-T1. I can see it is out of production and super difficult to get in the 2nd hand market, but will keep an eye on itMaybe try the Wavac pre amp?
In my system it saw off the Boulder 2110 and Vitus Masterpiece pre amps. And I'm a Boulder fanboi.
(I prefer ithe Wavac with Amperex valves)
Edit
Remembered...:
The Wavac Pr-t1 also saw off the Trinnov Amethyst and the top T and A pre amp.
It completely monstered both of those two.
With the Boulder 2110 it was different, not necessarily better; the Boulder was bigger, fuller, more tecnicolour. But the Wavac was better focused, more intimate, and just plain magical. Bass extension was deffo better from the Boulder, and if you told me I'd prefer the interpretation that was less dynamic had less bass extension but was more intimate, i wouldnt have believed you...but the Wavac makes my system sound magical, with that 3am smoky jazz club vibe.
The Vitus was more detailed, but to my ears, too dry, lacked the dynamics of the Boulder and the intimacy of the Wavac. Instrumental timbre was good though.The Trinnov was clearly a level below all of the aforementioned, with the exception of the T&A which was just plain rubbish; thin and sterile.
Hi JSA! The upgrade to PAC2 provided a startling component-like change. I noticed more body, transparency, space between instruments, rich tonality, texture, better dynamics. Other than that...Gentlemen, there is very little mentioned about upgrade of Pacific to v2.
Would you be kind enough to share more comments regarding upgrade? What are the key changes? (Some of you mention more resolution and better bass). More resolution doesn’t create less musicality and more sterile sound?
Anyone of you who regrets a decision to upgrade?
Sounds like a no brainer to just go and do the upgrade, right?Hi JSA! The upgrade to PAC2 provided a startling component-like change. I noticed more body, transparency, space between instruments, rich tonality, texture, better dynamics. Other than that...
Let's just say in my system I was REALLY glad I did itSounds like a no brainer to just go and do the upgrade, right?
I use a Goldpoint SA2XM, modified with silver internal wiring, with my Pac 2. I love the combination.Anyone tried passive preamp with Pacific? Music First, Billington, Townshend or Bespoke?