853guy,
Allow me to say your writings are just incredible, very creative yet very "grounded"! Very good reporting there, surely better than 99% of the stuff we read online about shows...
Anyway, thanks for taking the time and writing about the YG. The Carmel 2 is indeed a fantastic speaker, and as a truly transparent (ie not "voiced") speaker, what you heard was truly a sum of everything that was in the room, including that less-than-stellar source (that I know well) and typical Class-D souding Corona. We've had our share of amps pass through the YGs, and it's very immediately obvious what they (the amps) are doing, either positive or negative. Some will make the YGs lack bass, some will have thunderous bass, some will sparkle, some others will be dull and lifeless... Such is life with a speaker that transparent
Now, tube amps pose a different challenge on the YGs, as they must have power. By far some of the most fun we had was when we demoed the YG Carmel 2s in one of our big reference rooms with the Audiopax M100 monoblocs (100W)!
And then, horns... I'm a hardcore prog guy, and from time to time, I'd lock myself up in our "horns+tubes" room (Audiopax on Avantgarde Duos), and crank some ol' Genesis or Van der Graaf GeneratorThe involvement level is very, very high with horns! It's just a more enveloping experience, like you're in a front-row seat, as opposed to a more contemplative and "panoramic" viewpoint from a YG, for instance.
...
cheers,
alex
Oh, thanks, Asiufy, that’s nice of you to say. It’s great to be able to share an experience like the Carmel’s gave me and have it received in the spirit it’s intended.
One other thing I forgot to say about the Carmel 2’s that I really, really liked was that they didn’t come across as difficult to drive in the sense that they were very dynamic even at modest levels. Hats off to whoever the guy was manning the room when I was in there, but in wonderful Dutch fashion kept the volume civil and didn’t try and crank it. During Joe’s “Take 5” solo it was really easy to tell how much pressure he was applying to the head of the kick drum, modulating the intensity as if he was “playing” the drum rather than just “hitting” it. You could still hear him feathering it during the early parts of the solo, and then when he really laid into the head, the expansion and contraction of natural room reverb that stretched across the soundstage without the decay being foreshortened nor exaggerated remained easily discernible. All of this despite the modest volume, although the fact that the hotel room dictated a near-field listening position probably helped. That takes nothing away from their performance though, and I think it’s a testament to their design that they achieved it with less-than ideal amplification.
And although I imagine you can feed them endless amounts of high-quality current and spend way more on amplification that the subtotal of the Carmel 2 itself with a commensurate lift in ultimate involvement (and if you could, why wouldn’t you?), it sounded like a design that doesn’t sacrifice micro-dynamic subtlety at the altar of greater power handling and scale. Again, really impressive.
I think you’ve articulated the difference in perspective dynamics vs horns gives you - the contemplation of good dynamics the envelopment of horns. One is looking “at”, the other looking “in”. I guess it could be said stats and planars are looking “through”, but by this stage the analogy is probably reaching the limits of its plasticity...!
spiritofmusic said:Alex, 853 is the best writer on WBF bar none
Come on Spirit, you guys just aren’t trying hard enough.