Sure, I wasn't suggesting that you go there - it's an arid place, devoid of any spark of curiosity, sucks the life out of everyone who enters.
Objectivists - what might be wrong with this label/viewpoint!!
- Thread starter jkeny
- Start date
Sure, I wasn't suggesting that you go there - it's an arid place, devoid of any spark of curiosity, sucks the life out of everyone who enters.
All of this is largely irrelevant as no one has shown that you have valid measures of realism in music reproduction. If you have ever heard an improvement with a new power cord, isolation device, or ac filtering device, you have to know that your measures are deficient.
I would love to see a simple correlation coefficient between measurements and a ranking of quality among listeners. My guess were anyone to do this, a coefficient of over .3 would surprise me. This, of course, would mean your measures are explaining 9% of the variance. This is better than weather forecasting, but hardly definitive or satisfying.
I would love to see a simple correlation coefficient between measurements and a ranking of quality among listeners. My guess were anyone to do this, a coefficient of over .3 would surprise me. This, of course, would mean your measures are explaining 9% of the variance. This is better than weather forecasting, but hardly definitive or satisfying.
Looks like he might have.
. Strange is that he keeps giving me a chance to explain the point further. On HA forum Arny said the letters ABX were a play on his initials!Arnyk on HA forum said:
I just can't fathom sometimes why he says what he says.
I just can't fathom sometimes why he says what he says.
At this stage I believe he has an overwhelming compunction for digging holes into which he has fallen too many times by now.
This might help to answer some questions:
http://www.slate.com/articles/healt..._machiavellianism_narcissism_psychopathy.html
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/troll4.htm
http://netforbeginners.about.com/od/weirdwebculture/f/what-is-an-internet-troll.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
Thankfully, this site does a much better job of moderating than some of the other sites. CA, for example, has virtually no moderating and trolls often run wild. Some have even accused the site (CA) owner of employing paid trolls. Unfortunately, trolls = fights = clicks = income. There is one well known troll over there who came here to try the same behavior, but received a warning pretty quickly. Predictably, he jumped back over to CA where trolling and the purposeful spreading of armchair misinformation go unchecked. One especially irritating characteristic of the troll, is that they typically have no formal education/training, or credentials, whatsoever, yet expect everyone to address their every armchair assertion. Very annoying. Loitering on forums, literally 24/7, is pretty typical, as well.
I recommend reading a bit on troll psychology, it explains a lot of the behavior we see.
Additional info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
http://www.slate.com/articles/healt..._machiavellianism_narcissism_psychopathy.html
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/troll4.htm
http://netforbeginners.about.com/od/weirdwebculture/f/what-is-an-internet-troll.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
Thankfully, this site does a much better job of moderating than some of the other sites. CA, for example, has virtually no moderating and trolls often run wild. Some have even accused the site (CA) owner of employing paid trolls. Unfortunately, trolls = fights = clicks = income. There is one well known troll over there who came here to try the same behavior, but received a warning pretty quickly. Predictably, he jumped back over to CA where trolling and the purposeful spreading of armchair misinformation go unchecked. One especially irritating characteristic of the troll, is that they typically have no formal education/training, or credentials, whatsoever, yet expect everyone to address their every armchair assertion. Very annoying. Loitering on forums, literally 24/7, is pretty typical, as well.
I recommend reading a bit on troll psychology, it explains a lot of the behavior we see.
Additional info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
Last edited:
Interesting, so you are saying it is a big commercial site, where all the USB, PC modding, reviews etc etc are all driven by $$, and may not be genuine?
You have not really seen distasteful. Distasteful is Arny in the last 12 hours no less claiming that my positive ABX test results of original file to MP3 at 320 kbps must be fabricated. I even re-ran the test last night with the new copy of foobar ABX plug-in which provides cryptographic hash (fingerprints) of the files and the log file. He says I could have used two different files rather than the same one compressed. In return, I have asked him to simply run this test and report his results but he is refusing so far. I have even provided the timecode mark down to 0.1 second as to where to listen for the difference. Yet the accusation of unethical conduct continues with no foundation.
Read from here on (It is just a handful of posts but demonstrates what I explain above): http://www.avsforum.com/forum/91-audio-theory-setup-chat/1835641-mpa-vs-flac.html#post30527442
I wish putting the boot in helped but it is having no effect. The improper and non-constructive comments continue.
What is your suggestion? That we leave the FUD remarks be and create confusion for others trying to read and understand the topic?
Yea, I find the accusation of dishonesty to be the last inexcusable defence of this group of people who seem to have adopted ArnyK as their leader. Attempting to defend such behaviour & the person perpetrating such, I find distasteful.
A great example of why I find most blind testing suspect, is given in ArnyK's ABX results here
Immediately, both Amir & I picked up on the time he took for most of his trials - from 1 to 4 seconds - he was obviously not bothered doing the test & just hitting buttons randomly to get to the end (his accusations of dishonesty in others is ironic). Surprisingly, he didn't even realise that this would be revealed in the results & as usual, is expending lots of energy trying to find a way of explaining his gaff, yet again
I have reiterated JJ plea & asked for controls to be used with blind tests - something that has so far fallen on deaf ears. Such controls would quickly reveal such guessing by showing the false negatives & therefore eliminate the full body of results from this tester as invalid.
As it is a body of null results has accumulated but we have no way of knowing how many of these are from people like ArnyK, just not bothered (or agenda driven)? Using such results as "evidence" that listening tests reveal no differences is disingenuous. Without these controls blind tests are fundamentally suspect.
Immediately, both Amir & I picked up on the time he took for most of his trials - from 1 to 4 seconds - he was obviously not bothered doing the test & just hitting buttons randomly to get to the end (his accusations of dishonesty in others is ironic). Surprisingly, he didn't even realise that this would be revealed in the results & as usual, is expending lots of energy trying to find a way of explaining his gaff, yet again
I have reiterated JJ plea & asked for controls to be used with blind tests - something that has so far fallen on deaf ears. Such controls would quickly reveal such guessing by showing the false negatives & therefore eliminate the full body of results from this tester as invalid.
As it is a body of null results has accumulated but we have no way of knowing how many of these are from people like ArnyK, just not bothered (or agenda driven)? Using such results as "evidence" that listening tests reveal no differences is disingenuous. Without these controls blind tests are fundamentally suspect.
Last edited:
Similar threads
