My own impression, with all due respect, is that you did not like how the "debate" over the measurements of specific devices was going, so you threw in a trolling, totally OT issue complaining about the thread's rubric as "science", repeatedly, in fact. Then you appealed to the moderators via this thread to change the thread's name. And, as we all saw, that request was quickly and summarily granted without any form of due process or consensus. Shame on the moderators, in my opinion, for rushing to judgement under these specific circumstances and so quickly acquiescing on this OT red herring issue.
I personally do not care a rat's behind what the rubric of that thread is. Personally, I think the term "audio science" is and has always been overreaching. I do not think there is such a thing as audio science. What I personally think exists is a body of "audio engineering", which is a form of multidisciplinary applied science, if you want to get down to precise semantics. Even Amir often seems more comfortable referring to it that way. And, audio engineering is about more than just measurements. It also includes discussions of objective concepts beyond measurements. But, now we have what we have, which is a hastily and inaccurately renamed thread done in the heat of an ongoing debate.
The point is that debate down there in that thread was supposed to have been walled off from this sort of thing. It was supposed to focus on the objective issues in each thread, avoiding things like this. And, your modus operandi, if I am not mistaken, is pro subjectivism and anti-objectivism. You are fully entitled to your views, but why were you even there posting, given the warnings about that specific area of this forum? You even now say you have no interest in it. So, why were you even there attempting to disrupt it with this OT naming issue? You say you feel you know more about measurements, etc. But, I do not recall seeing any of your critiques or suggestions on the measurements that were actually under discussion, just this naming issue.
Yes, rename it to something sensible if it makes everyone happy. But, somehow, it seems the mere existence of such a discussion area under any name would seem to be the real problem for many here.