Quick update. Had quadplex installed, and hooked up 2 x monoblock (200w class A) and 1 x Typhon on the same circuit. Incumbent was PS audio p5 running both P5s. All cabling is Anaconda. Here is my first impression.
(1) I convinced myself there is a difference. The PS Audio appears a bit more dynamic, but there is a bit more "grain". The Typhon is a bit more polished and polite.
(2) If someone wanted to bet me $100,000 I could tell them apart in a double blind, I would decline the bet. There is a distinct possibility I could not tell them apart.
(3) Irrespectively, even if I tell them apart, it is hard to say which one I would prefer.
(4) My philosophy is components that are within a such a small margin of error will all grow on you. Owning component (A) or (B) does not make any material difference to the level of musical enjoyment.
I will very likely keep the Typhon and sell the P5, but I could have happily lived with either one.
My assessment may change after spending a few late night listening sessions.
View attachment 13045
The Typhon is hooked up to circuit with monoblocks. P5 are behind the main rack. Tomorrow will be the P5 against Triton shootout for my front end components. I have a 2nd Typhon on stand-by that I may also throw into the mix.
Curious that you find that the P5 is more dynamic than the Triton - I own a P10 and my only objection to it is that sometimes I feel like my ARCs are less dynamic. Are you mixing the Hydra with the P5?
Quick update. Had quadplex installed, and hooked up 2 x monoblock (200w class A) and 1 x Typhon on the same circuit. Incumbent was PS audio p5 running both P5s. All cabling is Anaconda. Here is my first impression.
(1) I convinced myself there is a difference. The PS Audio appears a bit more dynamic, but there is a bit more "grain". The Typhon is a bit more polished and polite.
(2) If someone wanted to bet me $100,000 I could tell them apart in a double blind, I would decline the bet. There is a distinct possibility I could not tell them apart.
(3) Irrespectively, even if I tell them apart, it is hard to say which one I would prefer.
(4) My philosophy is components that are within a such a small margin of error will all grow on you. Owning component (A) or (B) does not make any material difference to the level of musical enjoyment.
I will very likely keep the Typhon and sell the P5, but I could have happily lived with either one.
My assessment may change after spending a few late night listening sessions.
View attachment 13045
The Typhon is hooked up to circuit with monoblocks. P5 are behind the main rack. Tomorrow will be the P5 against Triton shootout for my front end components. I have a 2nd Typhon on stand-by that I may also throw into the mix.
I'm not very enthusiastic about PS Audio as there is to much internal complexity than can break, degrade, etc. (...)
You compared the PS to the Typhon? Or, did you mean the Triton?
Hi Erik,
Just a couple points when comparing any system w/without the Typhon. Make sure they are not quick, in-out comparisons that depend on a specific track or sample of a track. Once plugged in, the effect of the Typhon will take 20 minutes or more to become obvious, perhaps one hour to be safe. This is due to the time required for the Typhon to completely couple to the circuit as a parallel device. I assume from your note that you were comparing by plugging the Typhon into the quadplex directly versus plugging the components through the P5 without the Typhon?
Its better to leave the Typhon plugged in over a period of time or a couple of days and go through a variety of program material from sparse, acoustic music to more densely populated dynamic music. Once you are satisfied that you have a good grasp of the system's performance, remove the Typhon from the circuit and repeat the listening without it, or with the other product. If you are comparing units that are as different as the ones you mention, the performance difference should be obvious. If its not, then it might help to call and go over the specifics and system context because those are not similar products in design or performance.
Make sure when listening with one, that the other is disengaged from the circuit and not plugged in anywhere else. From your brief description, its hard to be more specific with suggestions, but feel free to call on Thursday or Friday if I can be of any help. Based on my experience with many comparisons, there should be fairly easy to quantify differences between the performance of these two products.
I am traveling through the Holiday, but feel free to e-mail, or simply call Thursday or Friday.
Best regards,
Grant
Shunyata Research
Today I swapped out the ps audio p5 for triton on front end components (dac and preamp). Very nice improvement right of the bat. Most noticeable is more slam in low end (for sure), better articulation of individual instruments (I think). None of this is "jaw dropping" and all improvements are incremental, but worth the effort in search of nirvana. Next, I'm adding typhon to triton on front end.
Hi, I have to second Grant on just let it play for awhile...maybe leave the triton in for a week...listening...then one day go back...you're likely missing out on faster swaps...The Typhon really takes a week or two...just listen...then down the road pull the plug on the Typhon...it'll sound like you put a blanket over the speakers...The shunyata stuff definitely creeps up on the improvement until one day ...it is jaw dropping when you take it out...my cents anyway