You very nearly became my hero
.
Being your hero could be dangerous on some audio forums.
> Lost a couple of points for the "powered" but not truly active Audio Engines, but gained a lot for the active 3-way system.
The Audioengine A5s cost $ 350. At that price level, is doubling the number of amp channels an inevitable design decision?
When the A5s expire (they are 5 years old now), I'll be looking for replacements at the $ 1000-2000 level. An amp channel per driver seems a sensible requirement at that level.
> What's the brand/model of the six channel amp?
At present, I use a Rotel 1077 class-D amp. I still have an ATI 1806 amp (class A-B) which generates a ton of heat. Practical issues like that (and room geometry and furnishings) effect my choices as much as sound quality.
The JBLs do have multiple inputs and a wireless remote that controls volume and choice of input. Since JBL has a solid presence in the USA, I saw them as having similar virtues to the AVI speakers you use and a better prospect for auditioning and long term support.
(Andre Marc)
> I am becoming a big believer in the shortest signal path...and DAC to active speaker is it.
Fewer boxes plugged in and connected together gives me better results than the usual many boxes audiophile equipment stack.
There are some companies getting creative in packing functions together but most of the traditional high-end companies seem absent from that party.
(Daytona600)
> i have heard worse $20k systems than this little system
Me too. I find it far more interesting to see what you can get for a little money than what costs $ 100,000+.
Bill