Great pics Phil, thanks. Anyone have any opinion if the gold plating on the pins actually improves the sound? All of the TK's that I own don't have it.
Here are some really rare Telefunken 802s, below the letter ECC are marks of what looks like a falcon, said to be selected for the German military.
View attachment 40023
View attachment 40037
And the falcon mark just below and to the left of the word 'Made'.
View attachment 40024
Was able to source them 14 years ago, and immediately was picked up by an ardent tube collector.
When I had an ARC SP 14 preamp, I used its phono stage into my Jadis JPL line stage, and the SP 14 used only 1 6DJ8 and I had a heyday rolling tubes into it as it was a very economical endeavor. I have tried the JAN Sylvannia 6922, Telefunken E88CC, Mullard 2492 (6922), Mullard 2493 (7308), Telefunken E188CC (7308), and Telefunken CCa (GABL German Post Office). All are excellent tubes with their strong attributes in the audio frequencies and in soundstaging properties, but I ended up liking the Mullard 2492 the most. It has a smooth and lush mid, with extended highs and tight bass, speed, and a certain tingling musicality that is very addicting. Here are some of my tube pic archives.
Agreed as I posted earlier those mid-80s CV Mullards are excellent.
Great pics Phil, thanks. Anyone have any opinion if the gold plating on the pins actually improves the sound? All of the TK's that I own don't have it.
I think the gold plated pins are for anti-corrosion purposes. Over here, I have seen corroded steel tube pins, with greeny gunk, such that the pins have to be cleaned with alcohol on Qtips. And worse case, I have seen tube pins which appeared to have been 'filed' just to remove the corrosion. In such cases, the gold pins would provide optimum contact with the tube sockets, perhaps much like we don't want to see corrosion in our RCA sockets and jacks.
Phil, I’m sure that the gold plating is for corrosion resistance. However, I am curious if there would be any improvement in SQ over nonplated pins...assuming of course the pins are clean in both instances.
Presently, a pair of black plates square getter Brimar 12AX7s are giving my Mullards good hours 'off the bench'. These have 1952 and 1953 date codes and are superior to the short plates manufactured later. The sound is a bit leaner in the mid and bass areas than the Mullards, but are well extended in the highs.
View attachment 40368
View attachment 40369
Glad that you brought up the Brimar’s. I know that Kevin at Upscale thinks very highly of them. I have not heard them, but I’m sure your impressions are accurate. Would make sense that they are a little leaner in the bass and the mids than the superb Mullards. Wonder how they compare to the TK’s?
Phil, I noticed that you are using the tube vibration rings in the photo above. One of our a’phile group members recently had a pretty nasty problem with those...they melted onto the glass and then down into the socket....not a pretty sight and fairly expensive to repair. For this reason, I have never used these devices as I figured that was a possibility and cannot see the value in them.
Yes Phil, that's pretty much what it looked like ( in your first photo)...only worse!! Personally, having heard about this from several other a'philes who have had varying bad experiences with the same thing, I am leaving all of my tubes..bare.
I think ARC supplies the rings on their newer gear...which surprises me a little as I know of two guys who had problems with the dreaded 'melt' even with the factory rings!