Today a fellow a'phile called me up and asked me to come and listen to his newly acquired CAT preamp. He was concerned that it didn't seem to be as good as he expected and wasn't better than the piece it replaced, a BAT VK5. So over I went and sure enough I had to agree with him, the CAT was asleep. My friend was VERY disappointed and was on the verge of saying that his new preamp was a POS.
So, knowing what this preamp can do I began to look for the cause.
It didn't take me very long to realize that there was a probable issue with some of the other ancillary gear that he was using...for the amp, an older ss McIntosh, cabling all older Monster cable which had oxidized, his front end was an old Denon CD player with a skipping laser! The speakers were NHT's of an older vintage.
I suggested that we try the preamp in my system to see how it would fair against mine, which although slightly older is IMO sounding as it should. The result was an eye opener, with my friend now beginning to realize that his older ancillary gear is at fault and not the CAT.
Makes me question how many pieces of gear have been unjustly slammed and for no other reason than bad synergy with the partnering gear.
So, knowing what this preamp can do I began to look for the cause.
It didn't take me very long to realize that there was a probable issue with some of the other ancillary gear that he was using...for the amp, an older ss McIntosh, cabling all older Monster cable which had oxidized, his front end was an old Denon CD player with a skipping laser! The speakers were NHT's of an older vintage.
I suggested that we try the preamp in my system to see how it would fair against mine, which although slightly older is IMO sounding as it should. The result was an eye opener, with my friend now beginning to realize that his older ancillary gear is at fault and not the CAT.
Makes me question how many pieces of gear have been unjustly slammed and for no other reason than bad synergy with the partnering gear.
Last edited: