I like to use SET in a bi-amped set-up, with SET limited to handling around 200Hz and above.
Good! If you're going to use an SET that's really the only way to do it.
I never thought it had anything to do with the interconnect.
Its pretty clear its got nothing to do with it; the mismatch between amp and speakers being the far simpler explanation.

To fix it you either need a ZOBEL network as I described or an amp with a much lower output impedance.
 
The Clarisys midrange ribbon driver is dead flat at 4.0 ohms from 200Hz to 2kHz, rising to 4.7 ohms at 9kHz.
 
Its pretty clear its got nothing to do with it; the mismatch between amp and speakers being the far simpler explanation.

To fix it you either need a ZOBEL network as I described or an amp with a much lower output impedance.
This could explain why, against my presumption, using the 8 ohm output taps actually sounded a little bit brighter and thinner to me than the 4 ohm tap -- if the impedance rise caused the amplifier to deliver more voltage in the upper midrange and above.
 
To fix it you either need a ZOBEL network
I have fancy Duelund CAST Cu/Sn 0.01uF 630VDC capacitors. So all I need is a 10 ohm resistor in series with that and then the series pair connects across the speaker terminals?
 
hasn't he tried the Westminster's?

Yes and at one point wanted to biamp not sure what happened to that. He is convinced he has to have tubes for midrange. He will stick to that ideal and match tubes to ribbons, like he will to 47 ft single ended interconnects.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lagonda
I have fancy Duelund CAST Cu/Sn 0.01uF 630VDC capacitors. So all I need is a 10 ohm resistor in series with that and then the series pair connects across the speaker terminals?
You'll need more like about 3.3uf and 5 Ohms if your speaker is nominally 4 Ohms to put you in the right range, assuming the use of the 4 Ohm tap.
 
Its a Bad Idea to allow an SET to play bass!

The output transformer of almost any SET lacks the inductance to support bass frequencies, since the core of the transformer is cut to prevent saturation distortion from DC current flowing thru it. So it starts to express the DC resistance of the winding which is quite low compared to the load impedance the tube is designed to drive; this is hard on the tube and not how you want to treat an expensive power tube. So the load line of the power tube becomes elliptical at low frequencies; another way of saying it makes lots of distortion and is hard on the tube.

If you limit bass to an SET you'll find it sounds a lot better; easy to hear/easy to measure how much bebetter.
Interesting. I forgot about this. Heard you say it in the past. I doubt its playing lower than 50 hertz.

And really, I could shove my speakers against the back wall, or sit in a corner to find fake bass. But I'm focused on Good bass. Not more bad bass.
I did just that with my ex, recording her playing Paganini Caprices standing between my speakers. The violin was a Stradivarius and it did indeed overpower the room….to the point my ears were pulsating and it was hard to not saturate the tape (R2R).
Volume has nothing to do with Brigjtness or artificial colorations from electronics.
 
Interesting. I forgot about this. Heard you say it in the past. I doubt its playing lower than 50 hertz.

And really, I could shove my speakers against the back wall, or sit in a corner to find fake bass. But I'm focused on Good bass. Not more bad bass.
50Hz is too low for almost any SET. 200Hz is much better as I mentioned earlier.

If you want good bass from a tube amp you simply have to use something push-pull. Its much easier to get the inductance to support bass in a PP output transformer since there's no need to cut the core. That is because the current of each power tube conducts in opposite directions through the core, preventing DC saturation. Its a much more elegant and efficient way to go and you get much lower distortion (greater transparency) as a nice side benefit.

There are many reasons SETs went the way decades ago. Best as I can make out people simply don't compare apples to apples when comparing SETs to PP.

Its a bit embarrassing how easy it is to beat up most SETs with a Dynaco ST35 (which is the best sounding of their amps). And its no problem to make a PP amp that sounds better than that.
 
Yes and at one point wanted to biamp not sure what happened to that. He is convinced he has to have tubes for midrange. He will stick to that ideal and match tubes to ribbons, like he will to 47 ft single ended interconnects.
Ron ought to research "Clarisys with tube amps" and do a tour around to hear the various combo's until he hears one he likes, or realizes it's not going to work......for.....him.

my only exposure to Clarisys was at Axpona 24' and none of those rooms would pass this midrange test for Ron (since they didn't seem to do it for me). one show, three rooms, who knows? just data points.
 
Ron ought to research "Clarisys with tube amps" and do a tour around to hear the various combo's until he hears one he likes, or realizes it's not going to work......for.....him.
He bought it after listening to it with CH and digital. That was his only digital audition followed by Todd’s trios which was a digital audition, otherwise he did not audition on digital before.

He bought gryphon as well after audition on Gryphon amps.

But yes, in his place I would tour that speaker to hear the best amp combo I like, start with that at home and then move away from it to what sounds better. I get the itch of trying new stuff though, that goes hand in hand with box swap tendencies. A successful dealer once told me he sells 95% of things without audition, because people like to buy what they haven’t heard due to the mystique/curiosity about that option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeterA
Ron has great VTL amps i dont think it gets any better in the tubeworld .
You should PM him, he stopped using them long ago. Am sure he will listen to you if you PM him a few times
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Lagonda
He bought it after listening to it with CH and digital. That was his only digital audition followed by Todd’s trios which was a digital audition, otherwise he did not audition on digital before.

He bought gryphon as well after audition on Gryphon amps.

But yes, in his place I would tour that speaker to hear the best amp combo I like, start with that at home and then move away from it to what sounds better. I get the itch of trying new stuff though, that goes hand in hand with box swap tendencies. A successful dealer once told me he sells 95% of things without audition, because people like to buy what they haven’t heard due to the mystique/curiosity about that option.

Kedar, I continue to be impressed with your recall, reminding us of conditions, and the way things have developed. Thank you for taking notes and reading them later. It grounds the discussion.
 
Kedar, I continue to be impressed with your recall, reminding us of conditions, and the way things have developed. Thank you for taking notes and reading them later. It grounds the discussion.

I don’t take notes. I just remember things that amuse me
 
  • Like
Reactions: PeterA

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu

Steve Williams
Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator
Ron Resnick
Site Owner | Administrator
Julian (The Fixer)
Website Build | Marketing Managersing