ATC VS WILSON SASHA

Genkifd said:

Audio GD as synergy is key as many owner's of Dukes also run with

Click to expand...

Hear Here said:

> If you check out artists with a reputation for very good sound, many are mastered on ATC speakers. That suggests to me that ATC can do a very good job.

Likewise, I'm certain that no mastering suite has speakers by Avantgarde or Magico or Wilson for that matter.

Click to expand...

BillK said:

Does this count? Not mastering, but mixing.

Click to expand...

BillK said:

Does this count? Not mastering, but mixing.

Click to expand...

Tobes said:

The original WATT was designed by Dave Wilson to use as a location monitor for Wilson recordings.

Click to expand...

Brad Lunde said:

MTB Vince: That's quite a system you have there. It must be amazing.

My favorite thing about ATC that most people don't know is how drastic the differences are in the front end gear- all of it- preamps, DAC's, turntables, cables, etc. With active, the low distortion SL drivers and ATC tweeters, the typical masking is gone. I hear small differences much more clearly- especially things like imaging differences. The " misty cloud" left by a passive system with all that stuff between drivers and amps covers up so many details I know for a fact the artist and engineering team (tracking, mixing and mastering) worked very hard to put IN the recording.
Brad

Click to expand...