Damn, you should run for office. You would fit well with others who make comments on what they haven't heard. That is worse than being a shill for the MQA format.
I don't blame you for your snide comment about my not having heard MQA yet still I still condemn it. Especially when the subject matter has anything to do with "high-end" audio where it often times seems anything goes.
But surely you realize there are often times several reasons for somebody making such a statement that to some could be interpreted as outlandish or non-sensical.
But hopefully you also noticed that I said the over-the-top performance claims associated with the MQA format by Stuart, Harley, et al, are impossible to achieve. Not just by MQA but any format.
Did you catch that? I-M-P-O-S-S-I-B-L-E.
Golly, you don't suppose I'm implying that maybe, just maybe, I know something you don't? Or is that impossible too?