Yeah...contemplated solar, but don't think we'll be here long enough to realize a proper return.
What...
Yeah...contemplated solar, but don't think we'll be here long enough to realize a proper return.
Ron, I have a question?
Why do you care what the output type is...as long as it sounds great! Personally, I couldn't give a rats ass as to this issue...
If a Class D amp floats my boat and works with my system sound wise, that's all I need. Sure knowing the type of output is a talking point, but IMO, that's all.
Go and have a listen to the amps you are inquiring about, see if you can demo those in your room and your system and then make an 'informed' purchase.
Simple, No??
. . .
What...
Ron, IMHO...there's a simple answer when it comes to tube gear...and you just brought it up. The answer is CAT.
IME, there really is generally nothing better out there. Although I think in the lower power outputs, the amp that I just acquired is the best I have ever heard. ( CAT doesn't make a low powered model...if it did I would have bought it)
I have just gone through a period of power cord listening ( one would be surprised at the difference that various power cords make, particularly on this Jadis amp). Have ended up with a stunning sound...
and utilizing the superb Rob Fritz cables ( Audio Art) power SE-1 with the excellent Furutech FI 28 (R) connectors. ( I happen to like them a lot more than the gold plated FI 28 (G) plugs )
I do agree with you that ss is generally not that attractive an option...although depending on speaker, it can be the best option. Martin Logan's and ss are a recipe for disappointment IMO. Not something I would want to listen to for any length of time.
Ron, when you said you preferred the class D noble amps over top of line amps, you meant the top of line from MbL, or CAT?
I meant the top of the line MBL amplifier.
Cat Jl7s would be my absolute dream tube pairing with the Maggie’s if I could stretch that far. Would pair it with the Cat legend and live happily ever after.
Ron if you got them I’d bring my dog over your way and you could adopt us all as well... would definitely be real contenders for the final audition shortlist.
Well, I don't like those so not surprised. Spectral 360 beat them easy on the 101
We found the NAT SE2SE monos to be superior to the CAT JL2 signature on the Apogee Grands.
We found the NAT SE2SE monos to be superior to the CAT JL2 signature on the Apogee Grands.
Maybe on the Apogee Grands..But I know which amps I would go for if I was picking between these two on any other speaker...and it's not the NAT's.
In what ways did you find the NATs were superior?
And Ron heard the 70W SE2SEs here.
However I’ve heard the 120W Nat SETetrode Transmitters on planers (AA Omegas), and it was a pretty bland, bloodless affair.
+1
I have heard these on planars as well and totally concur with your findings. On an Apogee Grand...which admittedly I did NOT hear the NAT's...they may well indeed work well. IME, CAT amps easily best all of the NAT's that I have heard...to my ears.
Morricab, YMMV.
And Ron heard the 70W SE2SEs here.
However I’ve heard the 120W Nat SETetrode Transmitters on planers (AA Omegas), and it was a pretty bland, bloodless affair.
Why CAT JL-7s but not Jadis JA200 Mk IIs or Ayon Audio Orthos XS?
(I think I might find the CAT a bit too neutral and not harmonically rich enough in the midrange. In other words I think CAT amps may be the perfect amp for a solid-state person making the switch to tubes. I would be very interested to compare JL-7s to Jadis on the one side and to KR Audio Kronzilla on the other side. Truthfully, I think we could listen happily ever after with any of these top amplifiers!
I wonder if MikeL ever auditioned CAT amps on his system versus the darTZeel 458 amps?)