Ahh.....but I wasAnd to further add to confusion, I was assuming stereo LPs. If you have mono LPs then it gets outright wacky, unless those monos were made after about 1956.
Ahh.....but I wasAnd to further add to confusion, I was assuming stereo LPs. If you have mono LPs then it gets outright wacky, unless those monos were made after about 1956.
Hello dear, it should not be difficult to try thoress. Reinhardt sends it to your home for a month, if you don't like it you get your money back. So he did with me in Italy, but enhancer still sounds that way.....The problem, as you note, is getting to hear one in the UK
If the phono stage takes the electrical peak (that occurs due to the inductance of the cartridge and the capacitance of the tonearm cable) into account, then there should be no need for loading at all. One nice side effect is that you also get less ticks and pops.There is no gain or loading adjustment. For many people this would not be acceptable. I just happen to agree with J Carr regarding cartridge and phono design
YES.....absolutely correct.If the phono stage takes the electrical peak (that occurs due to the inductance of the cartridge and the capacitance of the tonearm cable) into account, then there should be no need for loading at all. One nice side effect is that you also get less ticks and pops.
I have 3 month ago a ZYX Ultimate 4D with my SL-1000R...The difference between my Audio-Technica ART-9 and my ZYX are enormous. The C47 is very neutral. If I can say that : SL-1000 R with Audio-Technica ART-9 sounds like a CD and SL-1000 R with ZYX Ultimate 4D sounds like a vinyl...The C47 is enormous. With ZYX Ultimate 4D ( option SB), I must activate the subsonic filter...if not I have too much bass in the sound...and my loudspeaker are Magnepan 3.7i.....I received my Accuphase C47.
It's above my old Esoteric E-03, but C47 is very sensible with the turntable.
With VPI Classic 3, the differences between E-03 and C47 are very similar...
With Technics SL-1000R , the differences between E-03 and C47 are enormous...
For the two turntables, I use Audio-Technica ART-9.
Did you often use the subsonic filter (or any other external filters) with the Audio-Technica ART-9?I have 3 month ago a ZYX Ultimate 4D with my SL-1000R...The difference between my Audio-Technica ART-9 and my ZYX are enormous. The C47 is very neutral. If I can say that : SL-1000 R with Audio-Technica ART-9 sounds like a CD and SL-1000 R with ZYX Ultimate 4D sounds like a vinyl...The C47 is enormous. With ZYX Ultimate 4D ( option SB), I must activate the subsonic filter...if not I have too much bass in the sound...and my loudspeaker are Magnepan 3.7i.....
Just installed an Aries Cerat Talos II at a customers...what an amazing device...the level of analog with this machine over other very good phonostages is profound.I know the thread has moved on since the original posting, however I thought I might say for anyone else interested in phono stages that I am very happy with my Ypsilon, but it requires SUTs for MC. I also thought quite highly of the phono stage incorporated into the Shindo Masseto preamp I once had in my system. For what it's worth.
With the Audio-Technica Art-9, I never use the subsonic filter.Did you often use the subsonic filter (or any other external filters) with the Audio-Technica ART-9?
The question is: was the customer equally enthused?Just installed an Aries Cerat Talos II at a customers...what an amazing device...the level of analog with this machine over other very good phonostages is profound.
The Ypsilon is stellar. I am now running a freshly mounted Azule Platinum through a MC16. My Lamm LP2 D was great with NOS 417A's, but the Ypsilon is on another planet.I know the thread has moved on since the original posting, however I thought I might say for anyone else interested in phono stages that I am very happy with my Ypsilon, but it requires SUTs for MC. I also thought quite highly of the phono stage incorporated into the Shindo Masseto preamp I once had in my system. For what it's worth.
He said so...all I can sayThe question is: was the customer equally enthused?
What do you like the most about the Aries Cerat Talos II, especially comparing to MKI?He said so...all I can say
I actually have never heard the MK I. Comparing to other phono stages that I have heard though, more dynamics, more "gravitas" and solidity of images...it just sounds more like a real instrument in real space.What do you like the most about the Aries Cerat Talos II, especially comparing to MKI?
Then, we make a good combo, because I only heard MK I.I actually have never heard the MK I. Comparing to other phono stages that I have heard though, more dynamics, more "gravitas" and solidity of images...it just sounds more like a real instrument in real space.
Yes, Talos II Reference comes in two-piece chassis.Then, we make a good combo, because I only heard MK I.
What TT and the cartridge was the client using with the Talos II? Did you have a chance to compare it in a different set-up?
Just to clarify, do I understand correctly that it comes in the two-piece chassis?
Do you know what is the Max input overload - I could not find that info.
It’s Polish I thinkThanks for the answer. I heard a lot of good things about J. Sikora Standard Max, but I think I just listened to the J.Sikora Reference Line at one of the shows. Do you know where they are from?