I remember when Internet cafe's first opened. I was curious so went in one, ordered a coffee and paid for a half hour at a terminal. I then sat at a terminal looking at the search page for at least five minutes because I had no idea what I was supposed to do to make it work. Once I figured it out, the output was not great but it was pure and unadulterated. It seemed to be a good thing.Interesting discussion. Full disclosure: I have spent the last 40 years of my professional life studying AI. Entered grad school to do my PhD in AI in 1983. We were then a small group of diehards when there was no tech industry, no web or WiFi and no smartphones or even PCs! Most of my career has been in academia with two stints in industry: first job after grad school on the east coast at a big industrial research lab and after going through the academic ladder from young assistant professor to full tenured professor, I’m back in industry on the west coast in the Bay Area. Hint: the pay is better!
Agree with most of the comments here. AI is developing at a rapid pace, and I can tell you from the inside that even professionals like me don’t understand why chatGPT works. Theoretically the model is extremely simple, but given 100 terabytes of digital data and a billion dollars of compute, it seems to have learned to mimic some impressive human abilities. That said, it’s a chatbot that only mines correlations between words. But with a bit of clever processing these correlations seem to give it more power than we realized. Suffice it to say no one is more surprised by chatGPT than its creators at Open AI, some of whom I know.
Scary part is that as powerful as computers are today, they are nothing compared to the quantum computers now being developed at research labs. A quantum chatGPT would likely be far more capable. Can we control it? Unlikely. But as Microsoft has done with Bing, one can put crude controls like 10-20 questions per session. The next generation will not be so easy to control.
Today, algorithms limit my access on YouTube, and Netflix to only what appears to that algorithm as the kind of media I have already seen. I am unable to get a variety of unique and different that I may like, only same-ol' same-ol'. I read that algorithms do the same with Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. so that once someone looks at a site that may be harmful, they get the same offered back over and over from then on. Kids with eating disorders see others starving themselves to death, thus reinforcing the behaviour, kids doing self harm, the same. Republicans only see websites that show Democrats as the looney left, Democrats only websites that see Republicans as fascists and Nazi's. The internet now seems to be a bad thing.
A.I.? Quantum computers? What happens when they (AI and Quantum computing) get together to program the next level of AI? You know that will happen. Businessmen with their computer geniuses will think they can control it, but ... Remember how Franz van Papen thinking himself able to manipulate Hitler, persuaded Hindenburg into appointing Hitler chancellor and him vice chancellor? How did that work out for Papen ... for the World?