Clock cable question

Ian B

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2020
255
150
118
42
This might be slightly left field for this forum, but I've been trying a Grimm cc2 clock with my professional Burl Audio Mothership analog to digital converters for my recording studio.

I'm liking many things the Grimm clock does in terms of resolution, speed, vividness, and 3D depth. But it is altering the timbre of things I record in a not good way, suppressing bass and midrange, and adding brightness and bite. One colleague said that it sounds "less musical" despite the increase in audio quality.

I used the cheapest 75 ohm BNC cable I could find for the demo. My question for those with experience with external clocks and cables: Can a better clock cable correct the treble-heavy timbre I'm getting, or is this more likely just a clock and converter mismatch? Thanks.
 
For about $20 you can buy a 1-m Amphenol RF cable, or $100 gets you an H+S (Huber+Suhner) cable, either of which is a qualified cable from a reputable vendor. Available from Digikey or other electronics places. I do not like Pasternack but have used Fairview Microwave for RF cables in the past so you might want to look at their selection. However, it's hard to conceive of a cable mechanism that would affect the clock to the extent of altering the sound as you describe. I'd guess something else is going on. Do you know the signal levels and interface impedance requirements of the devices? Perhaps you need to use a shorter cable, or a 50-ohm cable instead of 75-ohm cable for the clock? BNC's are normally 50 ohms though "skeletonized" 75-ohm versions exist.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tony22
I'm just using a one meter Belden that cost $23. The cable and clock output says 75 ohm, so shouldn't that be correct?

It could just be what the clock does to my converters is a mixed bag, which is something people tend to say about external clocks.

I might try a lower end Shunyata because I've had good results with their digital cables, and the factory right around the corner (so to speak). But I am also skeptical that while I probably can increase performance, I might not be able to do anything about the timbre that is happening.
 
I'm just using a one meter Belden that cost $23. The cable and clock output says 75 ohm, so shouldn't that be correct?

It could just be what the clock does to my converters is a mixed bag, which is something people tend to say about external clocks.

I might try a lower end Shunyata because I've had good results with their digital cables, and the factory right around the corner (so to speak). But I am also skeptical that while I probably can increase performance, I might not be able to do anything about the timbre that is happening.
Ian, if I may, listen to Don and try the Amphenol or H+S before spending significantly more money on something with the sort of profit margins typical in high end audio. Not that you couldn’t possibly find a good cable, but these two companies have been making precision RF cables for decades. I suspect they’ve forgotten more about building RF cables than the audio companies who didn’t know what a 10MHz cable is up until a couple of years ago. In my working days we used both brands in Radar prototyping and manufacturing, the kind of stuff that using a 10MHz clock for audio looks like the child’s play that it is.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ian B and DonH50
I don't know about your specific configuration but I used to use a Gustard R26 with a LHY OCK2 external clock. I was flabbergasted by the difference the clock cables made as well as the fact that they needed 100+ hours before they really sounded right. I have no explanation for that and perhaps it was a psycho-acoustic delusion but to my ears it was easily and repeatably noticeable. The R26 took a 50 ohm cable and the LMR400 I bought off ebay for $25 was nearly as good as the Harmonic-Technology DC III, 50 ohm Single Crystal Copper Cable I bought from Hong Kong for $110. Other 50 Ohm cables I tried were less good. I did buy a couple of 75 ohm cables for use with my Etherregen but I heard no significant difference with the sound there. Bottom line is the cable can make a difference, I don't think you need to spend a ton of money, but do try a few cables to see what you like and just leave them connected and powered on for a week before you evaluate. Sorry not to have a specific recommendation for a 75 ohm cable.
 
I don't know about your specific configuration but I used to use a Gustard R26 with a LHY OCK2 external clock. I was flabbergasted by the difference the clock cables made as well as the fact that they needed 100+ hours before they really sounded right. I have no explanation for that and perhaps it was a psycho-acoustic delusion but to my ears it was easily and repeatably noticeable. The R26 took a 50 ohm cable and the LMR400 I bought off ebay for $25 was nearly as good as the Harmonic-Technology DC III, 50 ohm Single Crystal Copper Cable I bought from Hong Kong for $110. Other 50 Ohm cables I tried were less good. I did buy a couple of 75 ohm cables for use with my Etherregen but I heard no significant difference with the sound there. Bottom line is the cable can make a difference, I don't think you need to spend a ton of money, but do try a few cables to see what you like and just leave them connected and powered on for a week before you evaluate. Sorry not to have a specific recommendation for a 75 ohm cable.

Yes, cables make a difference.

Also, cable length can make a difference, as explained here:

Why longer is generally better for an S/PDIF Digital Cable

Both my digital cables are 1.5 meter in length.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCAudiophile
Best I can tell, the Grimm and Burl units are both specifying AES3 which is a 75-ohm interface. It is pretty typical to use 50-ohm BNC connectors for 75-ohm video (etc. ) cables. You could try setting the Grimm's output impedance to "low" and see if that makes a difference. It's also possible you simply got a bad cable. Or something else is going on. Affecting just a portion of the signal, particularly the bass, due to a clock cable is quite unexpected and a mechanism for that is not clear to me. Unless the clocks end up causing signals to be out of phase somehow.

The S/PDIF article is basically saying triple transit times matter when impedances are not matched. True, but in most applications (including S/PDIF and AES3) performance is best when impedances are properly matched and cables are as short as possible. Longer cables have higher loss and lead to higher jitter, big problems for serial data (Ethernet, PCIe, SAS/SATA, USB, etc.) or RF systems, not so much for digital audio where a relatively large amount of jitter is tolerable and frequencies are relatively low.

It's also possible the external clock connection is adding ground noise or a ground loop that creates low-level "hash" perceived as a shift in timbre.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ian B and tony22
A typical 10Mhz square wave clock signal has about a 10ns rise time.

Thanks. I don't have a 10 MHz clock yet, but that would explain why, for example, the clock cables that come with Afterdark 10 MHz clocks are shorter.
 
A typical 10Mhz square wave clock signal has about a 10ns rise time.
Is that for oscillators targeting audio clocks? I know the majority of 10 MHz oscillators I used in my day job (Epson, Seiko, Toyo, etc. packaged oscillators) had risetimes in the 2-4 ns range, but those targeted much higher-frequency systems (and we often used higher-frequency oscillators anyway). I don't know much about specs for clocks targeting audio stuff but assumed (probably wrongly) they were using standard off-the-shelf oscillators.
 
Is that for oscillators targeting audio clocks? I know the majority of 10 MHz oscillators I used in my day job (Epson, Seiko, Toyo, etc. packaged oscillators) had risetimes in the 2-4 ns range, but those targeted much higher-frequency systems (and we often used higher-frequency oscillators anyway). I don't know much about specs for clocks targeting audio stuff but assumed (probably wrongly) they were using standard off-the-shelf oscillators.
My comment was based on stuff from 20 or more years ago for stuff at lower frequency systems. It wouldn’t surprise me a bit that the newer oscillators and those targeted for higher frequencies operate with speedier rise times as you note.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DonH50

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu