Disposable Film Cameras at the Presidential Debate!

[Matt193]

Did anyone notice some of the audience members using Kodak disposable film cameras at the end of the debate? My guess is that it's for security purposes, but I also noticed a few consumer level digital cameras and phones taking pictures. I wonder why some people were allowed to have electronic cameras and others had film? I haven't seen someone using a disposable camera for a few years now.

 

[Steve williams]

I made the same comment to my wife Matt.

 

[Andre Marc]

Did anyone notice some of the audience members using Kodak disposable film cameras at the end of the debate? My guess is that it's for security purposes, but I also noticed a few consumer level digital cameras and phones taking pictures. I wonder why some people were allowed to have electronic cameras and others had film? I haven't seen someone using a disposable camera for a few years now.

No I did not notice. Interesting.

What I DID notice is that President Obama absolutely stomped the crap out of
Romnoid. A merciless beating that more than made up for the first one he slept thru.

 

[DaveyF]

No I did not notice. Interesting.

What I DID notice is that President Obama absolutely stomped the crap out of
Romnoid. A merciless beating that more than made up for the first one he slept thru.

+1

 

[FrantzM]

No I did not notice. Interesting.

What I DID notice is that President Obama absolutely stomped the crap out of
Romnoid. A merciless beating that more than made up for the first one he slept thru.

Indeed .. Romnoid ... I like that surname, buried himself with abysmal fact checking .. The pitfalls of an echo chamber ...with the Comment on the President not describing the Benghazi attack as "Terrorist" ... Then he dug a deeper hole by using the 100% of American motif in his closing statement allowing Obama to call the 47% percent soundbite .. He got creamed big time and in a way that makes him look bad . He seemed to have reacted physically to the debate blows looking at ill ease, stuttering and walking at one point in almost a robotic fashion...

 

[Andre Marc]

Indeed .. Romnoid ... I like that surname, buried himself with abysmal fact checking .. The pitfalls of an echo chamber ...with the Comment on the President not describing the Benghazi attack as "Terrorist" ... Then he dug a deeper hole by using the 100% of American motif in his closing statement allowing Obama to call the 47% percent soundbite .. He got creamed big time and in a way that makes him look bad . He seemed to have reacted physically to the debate blows looking at ill ease, stuttering and walking at one point in almost a robotic fashion...

Agree on your analysis. We have had enough of his flip flopping and utterly condescending attitude. His laughable attempts to identify with the American people are truly embarrassing.

He managed to do some thing quite amazing. In 2 hours he alienated women, Hispanics, non millionaires, and anyone with a working bullshit detector.

The most dangerous of men are those who will say or do anything, regardless, to gain access to the halls of power. We already had 8 years of a chimp who played president.

 

[DaveyF]

Agree on your analysis. We have had enough of his flip flopping and utterly condescending attitude. His laughable attempts to identify with the American people are truly embarrassing.

He managed to do some thing quite amazing. In 2 hours he alienated women, Hispanics, non millionaires, and anyone with a working bullshit detector.

The most dangerous of men are those who will say or do anything, regardless, to gain access to the halls of power. We already had 8 years of a chimp who played president.

Andre, agree completely. What worries me more are the people behind Romney whom we are not seeing yet. Their thirst for power seems almost unprecedented.

 

[Andre Marc]

Andre, agree completely. What worries me more are the people behind Romney whom we are not seeing yet. Their thirst for power seems almost unprecedented.

Although it is REALLY tough to beat Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Paulson, and Rove for sheer audacity in relation to Lust for Power. Power for power's sake. Screw governing.

 

[DaveyF]

Although it is REALLY tough to beat Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Paulson, and Rove for sheer audacity in relation to Lust for Power. Power for power's sake. Screw governing.

Indeed, but I have a suspicious feeling that these same 'suspects' are the players in the background. Plus a host of other, so far less well known characters... can we say Sheldon Adelson among others.