I will avoid entering in an insulting competition, my apologies for not following your style.
I already answered to that post in post #785. What was addressed was just sibilance and doubts on the tapes that had been used.
Please go on. Even long before the DSD use many people did not like and some even hated MoFi remasters. I am sure you are not alone, but the current prices on the usual LP markets show that your message is lost and people still value and appreciate MoFi LPs, in spite of the sandal. I will not sell mine and if some I like show close to me at a nice price in pristine condition I will not hesitate to take them.
First in post 1,062 I said to you, “Mike from Suncoast Audio exchanged emails (dated before the scandal) with another audiophile.” He was commenting on hearing a digital link.
Seven (7) minutes later you respond, “I read the thread in due time. As I said, nothing that can be taken as a firm public denunciation of the existence of a digital link” in post #1,063.
But then in post #1,066 I found the post in question (#777). I also discovered that it was originally posted as an answer to you. And now you state you answered post #777 in post #785. Perhaps you should reread post #785. You didn’t reply to me but to
Audiophile Bill.
The fact is that you already knew that some audiophiles were familiar with something being wrong with MoFI in post #777 before you made your comment in post #1,061 saying “Until the scandal no one came in public saying firmly they could identify the digital link.” And if you will look further back in the thread some others also commented on their dislike of MoFI.
Facts are facts.
Enjoy. Good night.