Sir , 6 hours is too little a burn in , cook it for a minimum 100 hours, if not more for it to develop .
I agree that 6 hours is too little for full burn in, however also agree that the basic sonic signature of a small signal 9 pin tube should be apparent after this time. If you don't like it after 6 hours, don't expect miracles after 100 hours.
The reports so far seem to indicate that some like the EAT, some are not so crazy about them. Depends on the gear and the person's taste. Sort of like different old stock tubes---some like Amperex, some like Telefunken, some RCA etc. So for $450 a pair the EAT's are not a slam dunk. And no one has commented on the life span of these tubes, although like good old stock you would expect (but maybe not get) thousands of hours.
Maybe it just me, but doesn't it seems that EAT is cashing in on its near mythical reputation for producing great sounding (KT88) tubes in the past (even though by many accounts these had a high failure rate) and charging extremely high prices to "prove" to high end audiophiles that their tubes must be great? They have to be great otherwise how can they charge $450 for a pair? Or over $400 each for their current KT88s. Does it really cost EAT 10X the cost of other current manufacturers to produce the same tubes?