Experts warn of 'perfect storm' for global economy

steve williams

Site Founder, Site Owner, Administrator
DAN PERRY, AP

This is scary stuff.......


CERNOBBIO, Italy — Experts and leaders gathered in Italy may disagree on the cure, but the malady seems clear: the world economy faces a "perfect storm" of risks that include prolonged crisis in a structurally flawed Europe, political paralysis pushing America off a "fiscal cliff," a slowdown in the emerging economies drying up the last of global growth, and the spectacularly destabilizing prospect of war over Iran's nuclear program.

A world of such unpredictable peril is also one in which jitters suppress the appetite for private and corporate risk, yielding meager investment and low consumption and prolonging the woes that snuck up on a booming world in the summer of 2007 as a "credit crunch", mushrooming a year later into the Great Recession.

Many attendees at the annual Ambrosetti Forum at Lake Como on Friday fretted about mounting U.S. debt and the Europe's inability to balance electorates' apparent insistence on national sovereignty with the need for regional coherence to salvage the teetering euro.

But economist Nouriel Roubini predicted years of gloom almost regardless of what is decided.

That analysis is rooted in the specific nature of this crisis, a downward spiral in which a financial meltdown largely caused by excess credit was defused by a blast of public spending; that 2009 stimulus, widely credited with avoiding a global depression, pushed some governments too far into the red for the markets' liking — a "sovereign debt crisis"; and this is turn was attacked through severe austerity measures that suppressed spending to the point that countries cannot grow their way back to prosperity.

"History suggests that whenever (there is) a crisis with too much private debt first and public debt second you have a painful process of deleveraging," said the famously apocalyptic New York University professor, a glowering fixture at such international talk-shops.

"That would imply many years, up to a decade, of low economic growth. And guess what? Economic recovery in the U.S. has been unending and in the eurozone and U.K. there's outright economic contraction right now, and that's not going to change unfortunately in the next few years."

The grim prognosis was consistent with new figures released a day earlier by the OECD, a club of the world's richest nations. Its report found that the global economy is slowing and that the G7 economies would grow at an annualized rate of just 0.3 percent in the third quarter of 2012. Furthermore, the OECD found, the continuing eurozone crisis "is dampening global confidence, weakening trade and employment and slowing economic growth" worldwide.

How to fix the eurozone, then? The different views are familiar.

Ali Babican, Turkey's deputy prime minister for economic and financial affairs, bemoaned the lack of a sense of common European interest — alluding to the lack of sympathy in places like Germany for the woes of an economically hammered eurozone colleague like Greece.

Other speakers focused on structural problems such as the "Balkanization" of Europe's banking system, which lacks a central guarantor like America's FDIC.

Increasingly popular is the argument that it is fundamentally illogical to allow a country to blunder into massive debt if it doesn't have the monetary tools to diminish its debt — lacking a currency to devalue.

Roubini said that the only solution was to extend the euro's monetary union in the direction of a banking, fiscal or even political union, at least to the point of having a single eurozone finance minister empowered to veto individual countries' budgets for exceeding a given deficit limit. "Today the eurozone is disintegrating. ... either move forward or you're going to fall off a cliff."

That rankled former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, who declaimed the idea of "a United States of Europe" as counter to the psychology and history of the region.

"The history of Europe is a history of states," said Aznar, who led Spain from 1996 to 2004, a period of tremendous growth that seems an epoch away. "We must restrict this and not create another thing that does not work."

Better, he said quietly, was to ensure that countries take the "right decisions."

Some applied that label to one decision this week, a bond-buying plan from the European Central Bank that continued to lift financial markets on Friday.

But others noted that the offer by ECB president Mario Draghi is highly conditioned.

"The decision by the ECB is extremely important but ... the ECB is only one instrument (and) if governments do not do their part the ECB will not be able to succeed," said JPMorgan Chase International chairman Jocob Frenkel.

It was easier to find common ground on the question of the United States — with great concerns that country is headed toward another debt-ceiling crisis because regardless of the presidential election outcome Democrats and Republicans cannot agree on how to close a deficit that is digging an ever deeper debt hole.

"The largest economy of the world cannot continue this way without doing any kind of predictability about what is going to happen," said Babican. "We don't know much about the budget of 2012 and we don't know what kind of fiscal policy there will be in 2013. A fiscal cliff is coming."

Also clouding the atmosphere was the slowdown in emerging nations — including China, despite growth there that remains far higher than in the West.

"Seven percent growth may seem high, but for China, which had double-digit growth for 20 years, it really means bad news," said Li Cheng, a China expert from the Brookings Institute. He said there was risk of millions of layoffs which could spark "the largest crisis in (Communist China's) history because it may cause revolution."

The final element of what Roubini described as the "global perfect storm" is the possibility of an attack by Israel or the United States on Iran because "it's clear that negotiations have failed" on stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions. "The last thing the world needs given its fragility is another war in the Middle East and a spike in oil prices," Roubini said.

Israeli President Shimon Peres declined to address the Iran issue but sounded a philosophically optimistic note, suggesting that from his perspective at age 89, crises come and crises go. "Today what we call crisis is more of a profound change that we were not organized to meet properly," he said.

His solution was somewhat deflating to the audience, a graying crowd visibly given to collecting bulky stacks of paper: Hand things over to a younger generation — global, digital, and largely "not so impressed."

"They are better educated, better built, and more up to date."
 
DAN PERRY, AP

This is scary stuff.......


CERNOBBIO, Italy — Experts and leaders gathered in Italy may disagree on the cure, but the malady seems clear: the world economy faces a "perfect storm" of risks that include prolonged crisis in a structurally flawed Europe, political paralysis pushing America off a "fiscal cliff," a slowdown in the emerging economies drying up the last of global growth, and the spectacularly destabilizing prospect of war over Iran's nuclear program.

A world of such unpredictable peril is also one in which jitters suppress the appetite for private and corporate risk, yielding meager investment and low consumption and prolonging the woes that snuck up on a booming world in the summer of 2007 as a "credit crunch", mushrooming a year later into the Great Recession.

Many attendees at the annual Ambrosetti Forum at Lake Como on Friday fretted about mounting U.S. debt and the Europe's inability to balance electorates' apparent insistence on national sovereignty with the need for regional coherence to salvage the teetering euro.

But economist Nouriel Roubini predicted years of gloom almost regardless of what is decided.

That analysis is rooted in the specific nature of this crisis, a downward spiral in which a financial meltdown largely caused by excess credit was defused by a blast of public spending; that 2009 stimulus, widely credited with avoiding a global depression, pushed some governments too far into the red for the markets' liking — a "sovereign debt crisis"; and this is turn was attacked through severe austerity measures that suppressed spending to the point that countries cannot grow their way back to prosperity.

"History suggests that whenever (there is) a crisis with too much private debt first and public debt second you have a painful process of deleveraging," said the famously apocalyptic New York University professor, a glowering fixture at such international talk-shops.

"That would imply many years, up to a decade, of low economic growth. And guess what? Economic recovery in the U.S. has been unending and in the eurozone and U.K. there's outright economic contraction right now, and that's not going to change unfortunately in the next few years."

The grim prognosis was consistent with new figures released a day earlier by the OECD, a club of the world's richest nations. Its report found that the global economy is slowing and that the G7 economies would grow at an annualized rate of just 0.3 percent in the third quarter of 2012. Furthermore, the OECD found, the continuing eurozone crisis "is dampening global confidence, weakening trade and employment and slowing economic growth" worldwide.

How to fix the eurozone, then? The different views are familiar.

Ali Babican, Turkey's deputy prime minister for economic and financial affairs, bemoaned the lack of a sense of common European interest — alluding to the lack of sympathy in places like Germany for the woes of an economically hammered eurozone colleague like Greece.

Other speakers focused on structural problems such as the "Balkanization" of Europe's banking system, which lacks a central guarantor like America's FDIC.

Increasingly popular is the argument that it is fundamentally illogical to allow a country to blunder into massive debt if it doesn't have the monetary tools to diminish its debt — lacking a currency to devalue.

Roubini said that the only solution was to extend the euro's monetary union in the direction of a banking, fiscal or even political union, at least to the point of having a single eurozone finance minister empowered to veto individual countries' budgets for exceeding a given deficit limit. "Today the eurozone is disintegrating. ... either move forward or you're going to fall off a cliff."

That rankled former Spanish Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar, who declaimed the idea of "a United States of Europe" as counter to the psychology and history of the region.

"The history of Europe is a history of states," said Aznar, who led Spain from 1996 to 2004, a period of tremendous growth that seems an epoch away. "We must restrict this and not create another thing that does not work."

Better, he said quietly, was to ensure that countries take the "right decisions."

Some applied that label to one decision this week, a bond-buying plan from the European Central Bank that continued to lift financial markets on Friday.

But others noted that the offer by ECB president Mario Draghi is highly conditioned.

"The decision by the ECB is extremely important but ... the ECB is only one instrument (and) if governments do not do their part the ECB will not be able to succeed," said JPMorgan Chase International chairman Jocob Frenkel.

It was easier to find common ground on the question of the United States — with great concerns that country is headed toward another debt-ceiling crisis because regardless of the presidential election outcome Democrats and Republicans cannot agree on how to close a deficit that is digging an ever deeper debt hole.

"The largest economy of the world cannot continue this way without doing any kind of predictability about what is going to happen," said Babican. "We don't know much about the budget of 2012 and we don't know what kind of fiscal policy there will be in 2013. A fiscal cliff is coming."

Also clouding the atmosphere was the slowdown in emerging nations — including China, despite growth there that remains far higher than in the West.

"Seven percent growth may seem high, but for China, which had double-digit growth for 20 years, it really means bad news," said Li Cheng, a China expert from the Brookings Institute. He said there was risk of millions of layoffs which could spark "the largest crisis in (Communist China's) history because it may cause revolution."

The final element of what Roubini described as the "global perfect storm" is the possibility of an attack by Israel or the United States on Iran because "it's clear that negotiations have failed" on stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions. "The last thing the world needs given its fragility is another war in the Middle East and a spike in oil prices," Roubini said.

Israeli President Shimon Peres declined to address the Iran issue but sounded a philosophically optimistic note, suggesting that from his perspective at age 89, crises come and crises go. "Today what we call crisis is more of a profound change that we were not organized to meet properly," he said.

His solution was somewhat deflating to the audience, a graying crowd visibly given to collecting bulky stacks of paper: Hand things over to a younger generation — global, digital, and largely "not so impressed."

"They are better educated, better built, and more up to date."


An economist friend of mine was saying a similar thing recently. However, he thought that there was a fairly simple solution to the woes affecting the various Euro economies. The answer, according to my friend, is to do away with the euro and bring back/float the individual currencies....which he expected would result in inflation. In his opinion a little inflation in several areas of Europe would be a very good thing.
 
An economist friend of mine was saying a similar thing recently. However, he thought that there was a fairly simple solution to the woes affecting the various Euro economies. The answer, according to my friend, is to do away with the euro and bring back/float the individual currencies....which he expected would result in inflation. In his opinion a little inflation in several areas of Europe would be a very good thing.

It seems appropriate, especially when various countries in the EU seem to be growing further and further apart ideologically. Consider Germany, the strong partner, whose citizens are becoming fed up with the entire affair. It isn't like Germany is trouble-free, after all. She still has growing to do in the East, even though reunification took place years ago. The German situation along with France's move further toward the left, Greece's unwillingness to restrain spending, Italy's unbelievable financial mess, along with that of Spain, Portugal and Ireland, not to mention the new partners who have essentially nothing to offer, like Romania, and you have parties that are destined to split apart sooner, or later. There are just too many divergent, and mostly negative, conditions to reach a longterm solution that keeps the European Union intact, in my opinion.

How all this will impact US trade is yet another matter. Things aren't looking good in that area because we depend on the EU for 20% of our export business, if my memory serves me. We have a vested interest, but no one seems to know which direction to take.

At the end of the day, is there a winner? Estonia maybe? Estonia is a forward thinking, growth oriented place, in spite of what its partners do.
 
Last edited:
This whole thing has fascinated me for years and particularly the last five, since the 'crisis' started. Am I the only one who has, despite better judgement, felt a sense of excitement and exhilaration as smug economists and politicians have floundered around and failed, while the 'system' is slowly revealed to be a huge Ponzi scheme? The sense of unease that the more perspicacious among us felt at how economics was supposed to work has been justified. While our smug friends and colleagues were telling us that simply getting into debt was the path to eternal prosperity, we had our doubts. While governments took on more and more debt on on our behalf, it all seemed too good to be true. The road sweeper bought a new BMW, and the hairdresser went on trans-Atlantic shopping trips for the weekend. Factories were built in the Far East while all the factories closed over here and people took on jobs in call centres and estate agencies. Money was splashed around and wasted as though there was no tomorrow...

In the end, none of us is a disinterested observer, but I feel that the best thing we can do is to sit back and enjoy watching the whole thing collapse - I don't know what happens after that. The only alternative is to stop trying to fix the current system, and make a conscious effort to start with a new one before disaster strikes, but it won't happen.
 
Shouldn't we think that the model is flawed? How far and how much can every company and/or Country grow with the finite resources of planet Earth? Can we go on just making stuff, selling stuff and consuming our environement? I do believe those are serious questions that need to be asked. We simply want to believe that the current system is the best there is and that it will go on wasteful as ever and not taking care of people needs. Something has to give. Something is giving. Time to tweak it and/or review it, we can but first we must acknowledge the problem.. I am not sure we are, we want to confront new problems with old solutions based on rapacious and never ending consumption, thus the solution proposed by DaveyF economist friend ... Pockets of inflation create needs for cheaper products thus flow of goods toward these pockets and then what, to me simple Engineer, that is a band aid solution, the real problem is not addressed... The source of the problem must be found not addressing the effects and symptoms ...We'll see but I can bet you that the solutions will not come from the old way of looking a things.
 
Shouldn't we think that the model is flawed? How far and how much can every company and/or Country grow with the finite resources of planet Earth? Can we go on just making stuff, selling stuff and consuming our environement? I do believe those are serious questions that need to be asked. We simply want to believe that the current system is the best there is and that it will go on wasteful as ever and not taking care of people needs. Something has to give. Something is giving. Time to tweak it and/or review it, we can but first we must acknowledge the problem.. I am not sure we are, we want to confront new problems with old solutions based on rapacious and never ending consumption, thus the solution proposed by DaveyF economist friend ... Pockets of inflation create needs for cheaper products thus flow of goods toward these pockets and then what, to me simple Engineer, that is a band aid solution, the real problem is not addressed... The source of the problem must be found not addressing the effects and symptoms ...We'll see but I can bet you that the solutions will not come from the old way of looking a things.

This. Capitalist economics as it exists depends on perpetual growth. It is, by definition, unsustainable and unstable. All ups and downs. Manic depression.

Tim
 
The thing that gives me hope that there won't be a perfect storm is that the experts are predicting one

Such beliefs always bring the dreaded outcome.. History hasn't shown that denial works.
 
Shouldn't we think that the model is flawed? How far and how much can every company and/or Country grow with the finite resources of planet Earth? Can we go on just making stuff, selling stuff and consuming our environement? I do believe those are serious questions that need to be asked. We simply want to believe that the current system is the best there is and that it will go on wasteful as ever and not taking care of people needs. Something has to give. Something is giving. Time to tweak it and/or review it, we can but first we must acknowledge the problem.. I am not sure we are, we want to confront new problems with old solutions based on rapacious and never ending consumption, thus the solution proposed by DaveyF economist friend ... Pockets of inflation create needs for cheaper products thus flow of goods toward these pockets and then what, to me simple Engineer, that is a band aid solution, the real problem is not addressed... The source of the problem must be found not addressing the effects and symptoms ...We'll see but I can bet you that the solutions will not come from the old way of looking a things.

As always, the rub is in who does the tweaking. Right now, it seems that we are being tweaked into a larger crisis by the very measures designed to fix the current one.

I am reminded...


Belling the Cat


Long ago, the mice had a general council to consider what measures they could take to outwit their common enemy, the Cat. Some said this, and some said that; but at last a young mouse got up and said he had a proposal to make, which he thought would meet the case. “You will all agree,” said he, “that our chief danger consists in the sly and treacherous manner in which the enemy approaches us. Now, if we could receive some signal of her approach, we could easily escape from her. I venture, therefore, to propose that a small bell be procured, and attached by a ribbon round the neck of the Cat. By this means we should always know when she was about, and could easily retire while she was in the neighbourhood.”
This proposal met with general applause, until an old mouse got up and said: “That is all very well, but who is to bell the Cat?” The mice looked at one another and nobody spoke. Then the old mouse said, “It is easy to propose impossible remedies.”
 
Mosin

I am an optimist: That we, don't see a solution doesn't mean there isn't one that will be implemented. I remain optimist.. Recent history is not encouraging though, when the whims of a casino-like structure (aka The Stock Market) governs World Affairs and ultimately innocent people lives.
 
The economic model is re-shaping as we speak, old habits like over-spending, lack of productivity, local reach and hierarchical business models are melting - a new approach of frugal-thinking, expansive democratic clusters, globalization and virtual markets are going to preveil - so in a way we are now in the "eye" of this perfect storm of new economic rules to come.
 
The economic model is re-shaping as we speak, old habits like over-spending, lack of productivity, local reach and hierarchical business models are melting - a new approach of frugal-thinking, expansive democratic clusters, globalization and virtual markets are going to preveil - so in a way we are now in the "eye" of this perfect storm of new economic rules to come.
Fortunately, or unfortunately depending on your politics, I'm sixty-one years old, so I won't have to put up with all this uncertainty for too many years! :D
 
---...And I'd rather be now in the "eye" of that 'perfect storm' from global economy,
than be in the axe (a$$) of it! :D

Anyway, most people've been 'waxed' already.
 
........... the 'system' is slowly revealed to be a huge Ponzi scheme? The sense of unease that the more perspicacious among us felt at how economics was supposed to work has been justified. ..........

+ 1 Well said.
 

About us

  • What’s Best Forum is THE forum for high end audio, product reviews, advice and sharing experiences on the best of everything else. This is THE place where audiophiles and audio companies discuss vintage, contemporary and new audio products, music servers, music streamers, computer audio, digital-to-analog converters, turntables, phono stages, cartridges, reel-to-reel tape machines, speakers, headphones and tube and solid-state amplification. Founded in 2010 What’s Best Forum invites intelligent and courteous people of all interests and backgrounds to describe and discuss the best of everything. From beginners to life-long hobbyists to industry professionals, we enjoy learning about new things and meeting new people, and participating in spirited debates.

Quick Navigation

User Menu