link is deadFinally, a very good question. Anyone care to take a stab? Alternatively you couid go read the AudioQuest paper on directionality and noise in audio cables, it’s strictly up to you. See my post earlier, was it last week? Exhibit B
link is deadFinally, a very good question. Anyone care to take a stab? Alternatively you couid go read the AudioQuest paper on directionality and noise in audio cables, it’s strictly up to you. See my post earlier, was it last week? Exhibit B
As much as adding any other sort of super-duper expensive directional fuse?What good would it possibly do to have a super duper conducting Graphene fuse wire when the entire rest of the system is copper, including the end caps?
OMG, did China hack the AudioQuest website? Did they go out of business? What’s the story, morning glory? Did they stumble on this thread? Did they recant? Web site under construction? Did they just sign up to be a donor at ASR?link is dead
I believe it is about eliminating the 'weakest link' than to try and improve anything else in the chain.What good would it possibly do to have a super duper conducting Graphene fuse wire when the entire rest of the system is copper, including the end caps? Besides, Graphene is defined as a two dimensional material, if you make it into a solid 3 dimensional material like a wire it’s no longer Graphene.
I don’t know. Just get 404 webpage not available noticeOMG, did China hack the AudioQuest website? Did they go out of business? What’s the story, morning glory?
I guess. That was remarkably unconvincing.This what your looking for?
Cable Directionality: It's All About Noise
If you’ve ever wondered about the arrows on AudioQuest cables, read any of our educational materials, or merely followed any of the online chatter regarding our products, perhaps you’ve wondered what this “directionality” thing is all about.audioquest.com
Rob
Can't prove a negative.I challenge anyone to prove fuses and wire are not directional.
these things are not proven. Proofs are strictly for math. In physics we look at the existing evidence and go with what it tells us. I can just as easily challenge anyone to prove there are no pink 5 legged dwarf elephants on the moons of Jupiter.I challenge anyone to prove fuses and wire are not directional.
A conductor’s asymmetrical surface structure causes a directional difference in impedance at noise frequencies and very high interference frequencies. Due to skin-effect, such high-frequency energy travels almost exclusively on the surface of a conductor, giving significance to the directional difference in impedance at these frequencies.
The idea that fuses or wire conducting AC signals are directional is extraordinary, so you are on the hook to provide the extraordinary evidence.I challenge anyone to prove fuses and wire are not directional. And yes, I know what you’re thinking: “but it’s the responsibility of the person making the claim to prove the claim.”
I must be a mind reader.The idea that fuses or wire conducting AC signals are directional is extraordinary, so you are on the hook to provide the extraordinary evidence.
Very doubtful.I must be a mind reader.
Verifiable evidence? The term directionality is completely subjective. I can say 50,000 audiophiles have heard directionality themselves, and a handful of skeptics say no, they don’t hear it or they won’t try. I’d say, objectively looking at those numbers the ayes have it by far. The evidence that directionality is real far outweighs evidence to the contrary.these things are not proven. Proofs are strictly for math. In physics we look at the existing evidence and go with what it tells us. I can just as easily challenge anyone to prove there are no pink 5 legged dwarf elephants on the moons of Jupiter.
I challenge anyone to offer objective verifiable evidence that fuses make any difference in the actual sound of a component or that cable direction makes an audible difference. Let's look at the non anecdotal evidence and evaluate it. If they make an actual audible difference in the audio signal that difference will show up in objective measurements in that signal and will be reliably detected in well designed bias controlled listening tests.
Let's see that evidence.
Nope. It's 100% objective. Particularly with wires and fuses.Verifiable evidence? The term directionality is completely subjective.
But we already showed that objective observations, I.e., measurements, aren’t convincing. Blame it on the bossa nova. Besides, as someone just pointed out, you can’t prove a negative. As a general comment, I’d opine that fuse skeptics are a looking very much like outliers in the overall scheme of things in the sense on one hand more than 120,000 audiophile fuses have been sold yet there are very few fuse skeptics.Nope. It's 100% objective. Particularly with wires and fuses.