Do you think the Devialet is also theoretically the perfect amplifier?
Not after comparing it to the Hypex Ncores. Although it may have been handicapped by the rest of the circuitry before it like the DAC section and USB interface.
Do you think the Devialet is also theoretically the perfect amplifier?
Not after comparing it to the Hypex Ncores. Although it may have been handicapped by the rest of the circuitry before it like the DAC section and USB interface.
I have used Devialet here and Hypex NCores and Mola-Mola's Kalugas, the difficulty is that the Devialet is a one box system , you can't divorce the amp from the interface and the dac, so it is very difficult to compare.Can I ask what were the subjective differences between them?
Can I ask what were the subjective differences between them?
Well many claim a class D amp like the Mola Mola Kaluga is theoretically the perfect amplifier. If this is true, what it means is if any other amplifier sounds different, it's due to coloration's being introduced. If those coloration's are emulated with a level of precision that far surpasses the ability of human hearing, I can't see why any amp that adds coloration can't be emulated. If the amp that's being emulated has no coloration's, then the sound should be indistinguishable from listening to the amp with the emulation profile bypassed.
Since when is Keith many? If I call Harlequin Everyone, do you know what Everyone will have to say about many?
Since when is Keith many? If I call Harlequin Everyone, do you know what Everyone will have to say about many?
A similar approach, although likely not at the same level i'm talking about. And yes this is the future of high end audio folks![]()
You should investigate this. Likely your approach is not on the same level. I don't think it is still available or I don't know where. There were some interviews with the guys behind this and what they are doing. The emulation they do is well beyond just shoot a test signal thru it and convolve the result.
Both SS and tube devices can do warmth but they are not the same characteristic IME.
Both can approach kinds of fidelity in terms of tonality and transparency in limited ways.
Every bit of gear I've heard displays some characteristic vestige of its process.
Technical Brain amps have a transparency but it was more like a clear liquid transparency rather than the transparency of luminance that great valve can do.
Some gear is more transparent in context, some more so in spirit. But everything has its nature and imparts that in some level so when we add colouration I figure we are additionally masking and adding to the mix rather than creating an absolute copy. recreating.
Systems with SS and valve in them tend to a masking of some of the characteristics of the different processes but we end up with complex and layered characteristics rather than pure simpler ones. Everything in the end is a compromise
Are we not well on the way to play back outperforming recording source any way? If so all this is bollocks
That's one of the beauties of manufacturers building their audio gear to be disposable. Makes for great deals on the used market place if a guy is okay with being a year or 2 behind.
You miss my point: that the two options on offer were both 'wrong'. They started from false assumptions.
Class A/B even class A if it is capable of driving the loudspeaker and Class D are extremely similar, provided all are capable of properly driving the loudspeaker in question.Spaz, it's not me who thinks everything can/should be homogenized out.
I'm just saying, why stop just at making vivacious tubes sound like tonally dead Class D.
Why not have an amp that can make all the great analog rich musicians of the 50's-80's sound like flattened digital facsimiles of the 00's/10's?
Want yr Miles "Kind Of Blue" to sound hot mastered/brickwalled - yep, there'll be an amp option for this too!
(in case Blizz detects any sarcasm/vitriol from me)
I fully understand one can buy an amp that sounds sharp and astringent, and one that sounds warm and wooly. But I really need to hear an amp that is so neutral, so chameleon-like, so adaptable, that it has no sound in itself, plug-ins for every signature out there. Just why would you even bother to be a designer in future when the big boys will knock these off no problem at all?
I fully understand one can buy an amp that sounds sharp and astringent, and one that sounds warm and wooly. But I really need to hear an amp that is so neutral, so chameleon-like, so adaptable, that it has no sound in itself, plug-ins for every signature out there. Just why would you even bother to be a designer in future when the big boys will knock these off no problem at all?
![]() | Steve Williams Site Founder | Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Ron Resnick Site Owner | Administrator | ![]() | Julian (The Fixer) Website Build | Marketing Managersing |